Why is the medical examiners autopsy completed within 24 to 48 hours of a homicide?

Answer:

The coroner may order a post-mortem examination to determine the cause, identification of the remains, document injuries, and to assist in determining the manner of death. A coroner usually orders a forensic autopsy if foul play is suspected.

Explanation:

The 24- 48 window is a good time for everything to still be the same it was after the incident therefore no more further injuries could happen  and everything is still "fresh".

What are some comebacks when someone shames you for being a teen mom? I need them asap, ty your a life savver :)))

What is the difference between a serial killer and someone who kills repeatedly and is charged under RICO? What
different facts would need to be presented for a RICO charge to work?

For any geometric figures A and B , if A ≈ B, then B ≈ A.

What are the steps through a civil case?

HELP!!!ASAP!!!
which of the following is NOT something you should do on long trips?

Take breaks only when you're getting really tired

Inspect your vehicle

Check the weather conditions

Check to make sure you have your driver's license, registration, and proof of insurance

Mr Ali needs to build a swing for her daughter.He needs 9 feet of rope for each side of the swing and 6 more feet for the monkey bar. The hardware store sells rope by the yard. How many yards does he need?

state and explain the law of demand​

Peter’s Uncle Douglas is a state legislator. He works very hard to represent the people who elected him. What is the main focus of Uncle Douglas’ work?
a)To audit the records of the state.
b)To appoint judges and make court decisions.
c)To make laws for the state.
d)To enforce the laws of the state.

Jordan is on a ride along with Officer Leo. Officer Leo pulls over a car for making an illegal turn. When he goes up to talk to the driver, he sees a bag of what appears to be illegal drugs on the passenger seat. No one else is in the car. Officer Leo tells the driver to get out of the car. He places the driver in handcuffs, since he is the only officer there, and tells him that he needs to check for weapons. The officer searches the inside of the car and then the trunk. He doesn't find any weapons, but he does find more drugs in the trunk. Only then does he arrest the driver and return to the station. A colleague processes the driver, and Officer Leo and Jordan go back out.

Are the drugs from the passenger seat of the car the result of a legal search? Why or why not?
What about the drugs from the trunk of that same car? Support you answer.

Place the tiles in the correct order of how an appropriations bill would be passed

An inmate may be put in segregated housing for having a certain type of tattoo.

What do you feel about sleepy driver

What does it mean to be a swat officier ?

Why minors must provide work paper if they have work permit? And what is the document that can replace work paper if the school is closed and they didn’t graduate yet?

In what types of situation should police officers be allowed to not enforce the law

A woman was arrested outside of a house shortly after she had broken in and stolen some jewelry. She was indicted for larceny and later for burglary. She was tried on the larceny indictment and convicted. Thereafter, she was brought to trial on the burglary indictment. Relying on the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution, the woman moves to dismiss the indictment. Should the motion be granted

A plaintiff filed a negligence action against two defendants in federal district court, invoking the court's diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. Prior to serving their answers, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court denied the motion, concluding that subject matter jurisdiction was proper. The defendants then filed their answers responding to the merits of the complaint and denying negligence. The defendants' answers also contained motions to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Five weeks later, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action for improper venue. If the court determines that venue in fact is improper, how should the court rule on the defendants' venue motion

An inmate may be put in segregated housing for having a certain type of tattoo.

The Law, Public Safety, and Security career cluster would include?

Teachers, Doctors, and Firefighters.
Police Officers, Firefighters, and Prison Guards.
Park Guides, Teachers, and Prison Guards.
Doctors, Police Officers, and Park Guides.

Investigating Crime Scenes

Edmond Locard and his Principle of Exchange

Dr. Edmond Locard was the director of the world's first forensic lab in Lyon, France. In this capacity, her came up with what we now call Locard's Principle of Exchange. The idea is that whenever a person/place/thing comes in contact with another person/place/thing, there is some exchange of trace evidence. He also noted that the intensity and duration of the contact, and nature of the materials determine the extent of the transfer. For example, if you bump into someone on the sidewalk, there will be less exchange than if you spent four hours in their home.

Lessons from the JonBenet Ramsey Case

JonBenet Ramsey
The 1996 homicide (murder) investigation of six-year-old JonBenet Ramsey provides valuable lessons in proper crime scene investigation procedures. From this case, we learn how important it is to secure a crime scene. Key forensics evidence can be lost forever without a secure crime scene.

In the Ramsey case, the police in Boulder, Colorado, allowed extensive contamination of the crime scene. Police first thought JonBenet had been kidnapped because of a ransom note found by her mother. For this reason, the police did not search the house until seven hours after the family called 911. The first-responding officer was investigating the report of the kidnapping. The officer did not think to open the basement door, and so did not discover the murdered body of the girl.

Believing the crime was a kidnapping, the police blocked off JonBenet's bedroom with yellow and black crime scene tape to preserve evidence her kidnapper may have left behind. They didn't, however, seal off the rest of the house, which was also part of the crime scene. Then the victim's father, John Ramsey, discovered his daughter's body in the basement of the home. He covered her body with a blanket and carried her to the living room. In doing so, he contaminated the crime scene and may have disturbed evidence. That evidence might have identified the killer.

Once the body was found, family, friends, and police officers remained close by. The Ramseys and visitors were allowed to move freely around the house. One friend even helped clean the kitchen, wiping down the counters with a spray cleaner—possibly wiping away evidence. Many hours passed before police blocked off the basement room. A pathologist did not examine the body until more than 19 hours after the crime took place.

Ransom Note
To this day, JonBenet Ramsey's murder remains unsolved.

Your Task

Tell me about mistakes made in the handling of the crime scene in the JonBenet Ramsey case.

IN AT LEAST 1 FULL PARGRAPH of 4-6 sentences (don't number the questions!), answer the following:

What did investigators do wrong in the JonBenet Ramsey case? Consider the 7 Ss of Crime Scene Investigation. Were they all done?
Thinking in terms of Locard's Principle of Exchange (this means you have to talk about Locard's Principle of exchange), how did investigators' action (or lack thereof) influence what trace evidence was available to investigators?

Someone please help me

how many people in the world ??
​

Please help, I will give brainliest. I need more than one answer.



I am going to begin law school soon but I decided to write an opening statement to see if I am good or not. Sorry if it’s a bit all over the place but i tried. I just want to know your opinion.


Here it is



Diabetic Coma in Car Court Session
Law(s) broken : Driving Without License
Hello, the case I’m presenting to the court is for John and Jane Doe. This case is because Jane Doe drove her husband home because he was having a diabetic seizure in the car and his wife stopped the car and was in the process of driving him to the car when a police officer stopped them. I would like to start off with addressing that it is legal to break the law of murder. One of the biggest law as it includes taking a human’s life. It is legal to break that law if, and only if by breaking the law you save a human life or defend yourself. In this case the witness broke a law because their husband was having a diabetic coma. At most time during this case if there is only a single person in the car and that very person has a diabetic coma, it could cause destruction of property, a chain reaction car crash, and even the person’s life could be lost. Since there were 2 people in the car Ms. Jane stopped the car and was in the process of driving him to the hospital when a police officer stopped them. In the video she took you can see her and in the corner the navigation is set to the nearest hospital. I have asked for the body cam footage to present as deeper evidence and they agreed. Even in the body cam footage you can see that as well. There have been many cases in which the following case has been presented to the court in various different situations and have been exempted and excused of all charges. The law is to protect the people of America and have order, but in this case the law could cause a human life to be lost instead. Your honor, I believe that we can agree that the laws were set to protect the lives of Americans and to have order. What kind of order is there when you have about 5 families who have a loved one or even worse their entire family who has died, simply because of one person. The laws are meant to being justice to Americans, but what kind of justice is there in multiple people dying because of one man who didn’t even know what was happening. Thanks to Ms. Jane that didn’t happen, thanks to Ms. Jane, the possibility of that day being known as the day that many people lost their lives and all because one man who’s wife simply turned a blind eye to even though he was having a diabetic coma. But instead she followed the law even though she knew it would mean having many human lives lost. Possibly even hers. So I stand here in front of the court not asking you to rule for me, but instead to put yourself in the situation. What will you do, break the law to save other people. Or stand with the law even though it means you will probably end up killing others. Your honor, I don’t think there is much more to say. So with that, I rest my case. Hoping that this is enough to suit the court.

What is one of the main ways that Interest Groups work?

Political Parties on the RIGHT side of the Political Spectrum favour more
government involvement + rapid change in policy *
O True
False

Isaac lives in a country where when the police accuse someone of criminal behavior, that person is brought into a court. Then, a judge or group of judges determine whether that person is guilty of the crime they are charged with. What is an accurate description of this practice?

How long will it take for this to get taken down?

11. How does computer-aided dispatch assist the telecommunicator (911Dispatcher)?

A:It eliminates the need for map-reading skills.

B: Displays the location of all emergency vehicles as they move around.
C: It eliminates the need for telecommunicators to monitor fire department
D: It helps determine which unit is closest to a call.
E:
All of the above.

A company’s new product is sold for $16.50 per unit. Product sales in the United States earn $400,000 and product sales in Europe earn $230,000. How many units does it sell altogether in the United States and Europe?

imagine that in a u.s. presidential election Mr do wins 35% of popular vote in Illinois and mr. white gets 65% what percent will mr doe get?
Please help

Based on the quote what can be presumed about the rule of law?