What is the max and min of F value (F statistics) to accept the null hypothesis for 7 df for numerator, and 12 df for denominator

Answer:

The answer to your problem is, ( 22, 21 )

Step-by-step explanation:

You can look at the picture to see how I did it.

What an outlier is, when a point a piece of graph is “ separate “ from its other graphs or in this case ‘ points ‘

Example:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 hour    2 hour    3 hour    6 hour

  4            3                2            1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We can see that 6 is the outlier.

Thus the answer to your problem is, ( 22, 21 )

Picture:

The probability of obtaining at least one head in 7 spins of the Belgian one euro coin is approximately 0.9922 or 99.22%.

To find the probability of obtaining at least one head in 7 spins of the Belgian one euro coin, we can use complementary probability. The complementary probability is the probability of the opposite event occurring, in this case, the probability of getting no heads at all. Since the chance of getting a head or tail is equal, the probability of getting a tail in one spin is 0.5. For all 7 spins to be tails, we would multiply the probabilities: 0.5^7 = 0.0078125. This is the probability of getting no heads at all. To find the probability of getting at least one head, we subtract this complementary probability from 1: 1 - 0.0078125 = 0.9921875.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

The permutation value is 210.

We have,

A permutation of a set of objects is any arrangement of those objects in a specific order.

The number of permutations of a set of n objects is denoted by nPn or n!, which represents the factorial of n.

For example, if there are four objects, there are 4! = 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 24 possible permutations of those objects.

Now,

[tex]^7P_3[/tex]

= 7!/3!

= 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3! / 3!

= 7 x 6 x 5 x 4

= 210

Thus,

The permutation value is 210.

Learn more about permutations here:

https://brainly.com/question/30649574

#SPJ1

The complete question.

Result of permutation [tex]^7P_3[/tex]

The association between daytime temperature and nighttime temperature is a statistical association because it is based on analyzing data using statistical methods.

Specifically, the correlation coefficient is often used to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables, such as daytime and nighttime temperatures.

A positive correlation coefficient indicates a positive association, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable also tends to increase. A negative correlation coefficient indicates a negative association, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable tends to decrease.

However, it's important to note that statistical associations do not necessarily imply causation. In the case of daytime and nighttime temperatures, while there is a strong statistical association, this does not necessarily mean that changes in daytime temperatures cause changes in nighttime temperatures or vice versa. Other factors, such as atmospheric conditions, can also play a role in determining both daytime and nighttime temperatures.

for such more question on statistical methods

https://brainly.com/question/27342429

#SPJ11

The number of 8-character passwords that consist of 8 different letters that are in alphabetical order such that each letter can be uppercase or lowercase is 26C8 x 2⁸, which is approximately equal to 5.58 x 10¹².

To arrive at this answer, we first need to choose 8 letters out of 26, which can be done in 26C8 ways. Then, we need to assign each of these 8 letters to either an uppercase or lowercase letter, giving us 2 possibilities for each letter.

Therefore, there are 2⁸ possible ways to assign cases to the letters. Multiplying these two values together gives us the total number of possible passwords.

Note that we assume that the letters must be in alphabetical order, which greatly reduces the number of possible passwords. If we did not require alphabetical order, the number of possible passwords would be much larger.

To know more about possible ways, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19738345#

#SPJ11

Fatima paid a total of $725.95 for 5 pallets of paper.

Fatima paid for 5 pallets of paper to be delivered. Let's start by calculating the total cost of the pallets of paper:

Total cost of 5 pallets of paper = 5 x 129.95

= $649.75

Next, we need to add the delivery fee to get the total amount that Fatima paid:

Total cost including delivery fee = Total cost of 5 pallets of paper + delivery fee

= $649.75 + $76.20

= $725.95

To break down the cost further, we can see that each pallet of paper costs $129.95 and the delivery fee is $76.20.

We can use this information to calculate the cost per pallet of paper, including the delivery fee:

Cost per pallet of paper = (Total cost including delivery fee) / Number of pallets

= $725.95 / 5

= $145.19 per pallet

Therefore, Fatima paid $145.19 per pallet of paper, which includes the delivery fee.

It's important to note that this cost may vary depending on factors such as the location of delivery, the quantity of paper ordered, and the supplier.

Therefore, Fatima paid a total of $725.95 for 5 pallets of paper to be delivered.

Learn more about arithmetic calculations

brainly.com/question/11741776

#SPJ11

The probability that Anthony, Brian, and Chantal are in the same lab group today is approximately 0.8703, or about 87.03%.

There are 15 students in total, so there are 15 ways to choose the first student, 14 ways to choose the second student (since one has already been chosen), and 13 ways to choose the third student (since two have already been chosen). However, since the lab groups are identical, we need to divide by the number of ways to arrange the group of three students, which is 3! = 6. Therefore, the total number of ways to choose a group of three students is:

15 x 14 x 13

6

Simplifying this expression gives:

(15 x 14 x 13) / 6 = 455

There are 5 lab groups, and we want to find the probability that Anthony, Brian, and Chantal are all in the same group. There are 3 ways to choose which group they will be in, and then we need to choose 2 more students to join them, which can be done in:

12 x 11

2

ways, since there are 12 students remaining to choose from after we have chosen Anthony, Brian, and Chantal, and we need to choose 2 more students to join them. Therefore, the total number of ways that Anthony, Brian, and Chantal can be in the same group is:

3 x (12 x 11) = 396

Finally, we can calculate the probability by dividing the number of favorable outcomes (i.e., Anthony, Brian, and Chantal are in the same group) by the total number of possible outcomes:

P(Anthony, Brian, Chantal in same group) = 396 / 455

≈ 0.8703

for such more question on probability

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The probability of obtaining a sample mean greater than 92.25 WPM is extremely small, approaching zero.

We can use the Central Limit Theorem to solve this problem, since we have a large sample size (n=6666) and a known population mean (μ=8989) and standard deviation (σ=1616).

The Central Limit Theorem states that the distribution of the sample means will be approximately normal with a mean of μ and a standard deviation of σ/√n.

So, for this problem:

We want to find the probability that the sample mean would be greater than 92.25 WPM, which we can convert to a z-score using the formula z = (x - μ) / (σ / √n), where x is the sample mean.

z = (92.25 - 8989) / (1616 / √6666) = -116.45

Now, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator to find the probability that a standard normal random variable is greater than -116.45. Since this probability is extremely small (essentially zero), we can conclude that the probability of getting a sample mean greater than 92.25 WPM is also essentially zero.

Therefore, the answer to the problem is that the probability of getting a sample mean greater than 92.25 WPM is essentially zero, or very close to 0.

Learn more about Central Limit Theorem

brainly.com/question/18403552

#SPJ11

There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the marketing executive's claim that the percentage of readers owning a laptop is different from the reported percentage of 54T%.

To test whether the sample proportion of 50P% is significantly different from the reported proportion of 54T%, we can use a one-sample z-test.

The null hypothesis is that the true proportion is equal to 54T%, and the alternative hypothesis is that the true proportion is different from 54T%.

The test statistic is calculated as:

z = (p - p₀) / √(p₀(1-p₀)/n)

where p is the sample proportion, p₀ is the hypothesized proportion, and n is the sample size.

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (0.50 - 0.54) / √(0.54(1-0.54)/110) ≈ -1.38

The critical value for a two-tailed test at the 0.10 level with a sample size of 110 is ±1.645. Since the calculated test statistic (-1.38) does not exceed the critical value (-1.645), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is not sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the marketing executive's claim that the percentage of readers owning a laptop is different from the reported percentage of 54T%.

To know more about critical value, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30783931#

#SPJ11

[tex]\sqrt[3]{9\text{x}^4} \times\sqrt[3]{3\text{x}^8}[/tex]

To simplify it we multiply all the terms inside the cube root

[tex]\sqrt[3]{9\text{x}^4} \times\sqrt[3]{3\text{x}^8}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt[3]{9\text{x}^4\times{3\text{x}^8}}[/tex]

Now we apply exponential property

[tex]\text{a}^\text{m}\times\text{a}^\text{m}=\text{a}^\text{mn}[/tex]

[tex]\text{x}^4\times\text{x}^8=\text{x}^{12}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt[3]{9\text{x}^4\times{3\text{x}^8}}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt[3]{27\text{x}^{12}}[/tex]

Now we take cube root

[tex]\sqrt[3]{27}=3[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt[3]{\text{x}^{12}}=\sqrt[3]{\text{x}^3\times\text{x}^3\times\text{x}^3\times\text{x}^3}=\text{x}^4[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt[3]{27\text{x}^{12}}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\rightarrow\boxed{\bold{3x^4}}[/tex]

The expression that represents the total number of comic books Ray, Janet, and Simone have altogether is: x + 4x + 12

This expression is obtained by adding up the number of comic books each person has. Ray has x comic books, Janet has 4 times as many comic books as Ray, which is 4x, and Simone has 12 comic books.

Adding these quantities together gives the total number of comic books:

Ray's comic books + Janet's comic books + Simone's comic books = x + 4x + 12

Simplifying the expression gives:

5x + 12

This is the final expression that represents the total number of comic books that Ray, Janet, and Simone have all together, in terms of the number of comic books that Ray has.

To know more about Adding, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/710266#

#SPJ11

Answer:

18, 20, 24, 26, 32

The median is 24.

It is false that Parametric models are reliable when the models are flexible in terms of the project's size

Parametric models are mathematical models that make assumptions about the distribution of the data being modeled. These models rely on the estimation of one or more parameters that define the distribution, such as the mean and variance of a normal distribution.

While parametric models can be very useful when the underlying assumptions are met and the data follows the assumed distribution, they can be unreliable when the assumptions are not met. For example, if the data does not follow a normal distribution, using a parametric model based on a normal distribution may lead to incorrect conclusions.

In terms of project size, the reliability of parametric models depends on the specific model and the nature of the data being modeled. Some parametric models may be more or less flexible in terms of accommodating different sample sizes or project sizes. However, in general, the reliability of a parametric model depends on the appropriateness of the underlying assumptions and the fit of the model to the data, rather than the size of the project.

To know more about "Parametric models" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28589383#

#SPJ11

The total number of subsets of 5 questions that can be answered is 252 + 1 + 226 = 479.

To answer this question, we can use combinations. There are a total of 10 questions on the test, and we need to choose 5 out of them. However, we must ensure that we choose at least two questions from the first five.

To find the total number of subsets of 5 questions that can be answered, we can use the combination formula:

nCr = n! / (r! * (n-r)!)

where n is the total number of questions and r is the number of questions we need to choose (in this case, r=5).

So, we can calculate:

- The number of ways to choose any 5 questions out of 10: 10C5 = 252

- The number of ways to choose any 5 questions out of the last 5: 5C5 = 1

- The number of ways to choose 5 questions, including at least 2 from the first 5:

  - Choose 2 from the first 5, and 3 from the last 5: 5C2 * 5C3 = 100
  - Choose 3 from the first 5, and 2 from the last 5: 5C3 * 5C2 = 100
  - Choose 4 from the first 5, and 1 from the last 5: 5C4 * 5C1 = 25
  - Choose all 5 from the first 5: 5C5 = 1

  Total: 100 + 100 + 25 + 1 = 226

To learn more about subsets  click here

brainly.com/question/31739353

#SPJ11

The width of the pool is 18 feet, and the length is 24 feet (since it is 6 feet longer than the width).

Let's represent the width of the pool as x. Then, the length of the pool would be x + 6.

The total area of the pool and walk is given by:

Total area = (length + 2(4)) × (width + 2(4))

Total area = (x + 6 + 8) × (x + 4)

Total area = (x + 14) × (x + 4)

The area of the pool itself is given by:

Pool area = length × width

Pool area = x(x + 6)

Pool area = x² + 6x

We're told that the total area is 272 more than the area of the pool:

Total area = Pool area + 272

(x + 14) × (x + 4) = x² + 6x + 272

Expanding the left side of the equation:

x² + 18x + 56 = x² + 6x + 272

Simplifying the equation:

12x = 216

Solving for x:

x = 18

So the width of the pool is 18 feet, and the length is 24 feet (since it is 6 feet longer than the width).

Learn more about the width

https://brainly.com/question/29281920

#SPJ4

Full Question: A rectangular pool is surrounded by a walk 4 feet wide. The pool is six feet longer than its wide. If the total area is 272 ft² more than the area of the pool,what are the dimension of the pool?

The solution to the differential equation with the given initial conditions is: y = 2 e^(4t) - (1/2) t e^(4t)

To solve this differential equation, we first find the characteristic equation by assuming a solution of the form y = e^(rt). Plugging this into the differential equation, we get:

r^2 e^(rt) - 8re^(rt) + 16e^(rt) = 0

Factoring out the e^(rt) term, we get:

e^(rt) (r^2 - 8r + 16) = 0

The quadratic equation r^2 - 8r + 16 = 0 has a double root of r = 4. Therefore, the general solution to the differential equation is:

y = c1 e^(4t) + c2 t e^(4t)

To solve for the constants, we use the initial conditions. First, we have y(0) = 2, which gives us:

c1 = 2

Next, we have y'(0) = 0, which gives us:

c1 (4) + c2 (0) = 0

Solving for c2, we get:

c2 = -c1/4 = -1/2

Know more about differential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/31583235

#SPJ11

The tree is 10 meters tall.

To find the height of the tree, we can use the concept of similar triangles. The ratio of the height of the tree to the length of its shadow should be equal to the ratio of the height of the post to the length of its shadow, since they are both located in the same plane and are being illuminated by the same light source.

Let's use proportions to solve this problem. We can set up the proportion:

height of tree / length of tree's shadow = height of post / length of post's shadow

Let h be the height of the tree. Then we have:

h / 15 = 2 / 3

Cross-multiplying, we get:

3h = 30

h = 10

Therefore, the tree is 10 meters tall.

Learn more about triangles

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ4

The behavior of the Markov chain with starting vector [1,0,0] can be analyzed by calculating the transition probabilities and the resulting probability distribution at each step. The existence of stable vectors depends on the limiting probabilities, which can be calculated to determine if there is a unique stable vector.

A Markov chain is a stochastic process that models a system that transitions from one state to another based on some predefined probabilities. In this case, the starting vector [1,0,0] represents the probability distribution of the system being in each state at the beginning of the process. The first element of the vector represents the probability of being in state 1, the second element represents the probability of being in state 2, and the third element represents the probability of being in state 3.

As the Markov chain progresses, the system transitions from one state to another based on the transition probabilities. The behavior of the Markov chain with starting vector [1,0,0] can be analyzed by calculating the transition probabilities and the resulting probability distribution at each step.

There may or may not be stable vectors in the Markov chain. A stable vector is a probability distribution that remains constant over time, regardless of the starting vector. In other words, if the Markov chain starts from any initial state, it will eventually converge to the stable vector.

To determine if there are any stable vectors in the Markov chain, we need to calculate the limiting probabilities for each state. If the limiting probabilities exist and are the same for all initial vectors, then there is a unique stable vector. If the limiting probabilities do not exist or are different for different initial vectors, then there is no stable vector.

To know more about Markov chain, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30998902#

#SPJ11

The probability that a 13-card hand (from a 52-card deck) has exactly 3 three-of-a-kinds (no 4-of-a-kinds and no pairs) is approximately 0.0000266 or 0.0266%.

To calculate this probability, we can first find the number of possible hands that meet the criteria. There are 13 possible ranks for the three-of-a-kinds, and for each rank, we must choose 3 out of the 4 cards of that rank.

There are then 10 remaining ranks that can be used for the other cards, and for each of these ranks, we must choose 1 out of the 4 cards of that rank. Thus, the total number of possible hands with exactly 3 three-of-a-kinds is:

(13 choose 1) * (4 choose 3)^3 * (10 choose 10) * (4 choose 1)^10 = 3,168,192

Next, we find the total number of possible 13-card hands from a 52-card deck:

(52 choose 13) = 635,013,559,600

Finally, we divide the number of possible hands with exactly 3 three-of-a-kinds by the total number of possible hands:

3,168,192 / 635,013,559,600 ≈ 0.0000266 ≈ 0.0266%

To know more about probability, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The point on the number line that is 3/5 of the distance from the point 16 to the point -4 is given as follows:

4.

The point on the number line that is 3/5 of the distance from the point 16 to the point -4 is obtained applying the proportions in the context of the problem.

The total distance between the points is given as follows:

16 - (-4) = 16 + 4 = 20.

3/5 of the distance is given as follows:

3/5 x 20 = 12.

Hence the point is given as follows:

16 - 12 = 4.

(as 16 is the initial coordinate).

More can be learned about proportions at https://brainly.com/question/24372153

#SPJ1

The mean is found by adding all the observations and dividing by the number of observations, so in this case, (15+7+8+95+19+12+8+22+14)/9 = 22. The middle observation is 14, so that is the median. The mode is the most frequently occurring observation, so in this case, the mode is 8, since it occurs twice.

It's difficult to say which measure of center is the best without more information about the distribution of the data and the purpose for which the information is being used. If the data is relatively symmetric and not skewed by extreme values, the mean may be a good measure of center. However, if the data is skewed or has extreme values, the median may be a better measure of center. The mode is useful when we want to know the most common observation. Ultimately, the best measure of center depends on the specific situation and what information is most important to the decision-making process.

To find the mean, median, and mode for this sample, follow these steps:

1. First, arrange the data in ascending order: 7, 8, 8, 12, 14, 15, 19, 22, 95.

2. To find the mean (average), sum the values and divide by the number of observations:
(7+8+8+12+14+15+19+22+95)/9 = 200/9 ≈ 22.22.

3. To find the median (middle value), locate the value that is in the middle of the ordered list:
There are 9 values, so the median is the 5th value, which is 14.

4. To find the mode (most frequent value), identify the value that occurs the most:
The value 8 appears twice, so the mode is 8.

Mean: 22.22
Median: 14
Mode: 8

In this case, the median (14) seems to be the best measure of the center of these data because it is less affected by the outlier (95) than the mean. The mode (8) represents only the most frequent value and does not account for other values in the dataset.

Learn more about mode at: brainly.com/question/30891252

#SPJ11

To construct a 90% confidence interval for the population proportion of all iPhones that obtain over 94 apps, we first need to calculate the sample proportion: p = 21/34 = 0.618.

Next, we need to determine the standard error of the proportion: SE = √(p(1-p)/n) = √(0.618(1-0.618)/34) = 0.097
Using a z-score of 1.645 (corresponding to a 90% confidence level), we can calculate the margin of error:
ME = z*SE = 1.645*0.097 = 0.160.

Finally, we can construct the confidence interval: p ± ME = 0.618 ± 0.160 = (0.458, 0.778)
Therefore, we can be 90% confident that the true proportion of all iPhones that obtain over 94 apps is between 0.458 and 0.778.

To construct a 90% confidence interval for the population proportion of all iPhones that obtain over 94 apps, we will use the following formula: CI = p ± z * √(p(1-p)/n), Here, p is the sample proportion, z is the z-score for the given confidence level, and n is the sample size.

First, we calculate the sample proportion (p): p = (Number of iPhones with over 94 apps) / (Total number of iPhones in the sample) = 21/34 ≈ 0.6176, For a 90% confidence interval, the z-score (z) is given as 1.645 (since z0.05 = 1.645).
Now, we can plug the values into the formula:

CI = 0.6176 ± 1.645 * √(0.6176 * (1 - 0.6176) / 34)
CI = 0.6176 ± 1.645 * √(0.2361 / 34)
CI = 0.6176 ± 1.645 * 0.0790
CI = 0.6176 ± 0.1301

Thus, the 90% confidence interval for the population proportion of all iPhones that obtain over 94 apps is approximately (0.4875, 0.7477).

To know more about value click here

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

(a) The total number of students would be less than 27. There must be at least nine freshmen, sophomores, or  juniors in the class.

(b) There must be at least three freshmen, at least 19 sophomores, or at least five juniors in the class.

a) Let's assume that there are less than nine freshmen, less than nine sophomores, and less than nine juniors in the class.

Then the total number of students would be less than 9+9+9=27, which is a contradiction because we were given that there are 25 students in the class.

Therefore, there must be at least nine freshmen, at least nine sophomores, or at least nine juniors in the class.

b) Let's assume that there are less than three freshmen, less than 19 sophomores, and less than five juniors in the class.

Then the total number of students would be less than 3+19+5=27, which is a contradiction because we were given that there are 25 students in the class.

So, we know that there must be at least three freshmen, at least 19 sophomores, or at least five juniors in the class. Suppose that there are less than three freshmen and less than 19 sophomores in the class.

Then there must be at least 25 - (3+19) = 3 juniors in the class. This contradicts our assumption that there are less than five juniors in the class.

Similarly, suppose that there are less than three freshmen and less than five juniors in the class. Then there must be at least 25 - (3+5) = 17 sophomores in the class. This contradicts our assumption that there are less than 19 sophomores in the class.

Finally, suppose that there are less than five juniors and less than 19 sophomores in the class. Then there must be at least 25 - (5+19) = 1 freshman in the class. This contradicts our assumption that there are less than three freshmen in the class.

Therefore, there must be at least three freshmen, at least 19 sophomores, or at least five juniors in the class.

Learn more about discrete mathematics

brainly.com/question/13309484

#SPJ11

The  point (x0, y0) lies on the line passing through the origin, and hence the normal line to the circle at P passes through the origin.

Let P = (x0, y0) be any point on the circle x^2 + y^2 = a^2.

The gradient of the tangent to the circle at P is given by dy/dx = -x0/y0.

Therefore, the gradient of the normal to the circle at P is given by -y0/x0.

Using the point-slope equation of a line, the equation of the normal line passing through P is y - y0 = (-x0/y0)(x - x0).

To show that this line passes through the origin, we need to substitute x = 0 and y = 0 into the equation of the line and show that it satisfies the equation.

Substituting x = 0, we get y - y0 = 0, which gives y = y0.

Substituting y = 0, we get -x0(x - x0)/y0 = 0, which gives x = x0.

Therefore, the point (x0, y0) lies on the line passing through the origin, and hence the normal line to the circle at P passes through the origin.

Visit to know more about Origin:-

brainly.com/question/28613548

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

the ONLY roll that is two or less when rolling 2 dice is   1 - 1

 out of 36 possible rolls

     so 35 are greater than two     or     35/36

In a Random Forest model, each tree is fitted using a few randomly chosen rows and randomly chosen columns. This process is known as "bagging".

Random Forest is a popular machine learning algorithm that belongs to the family of ensemble learning methods. It combines multiple decision trees and creates a forest of trees, hence the name "Random Forest". The goal of this algorithm is to improve the accuracy and robustness of the individual decision trees by reducing their tendency to overfit the data. Random Forest works by randomly selecting a subset of features and data samples from the original dataset and constructing a decision tree on each of these subsets.

The final output is the average prediction made by all the decision trees in the forest. Random Forest has several advantages, including high accuracy, robustness, and ability to handle large datasets. It can be used for both classification and regression problems, and it is particularly effective in dealing with missing data and noisy data. Overall, Random Forest is a powerful and flexible algorithm that has found wide applications in various fields, including finance, healthcare, and marketing.

To learn more about Random Forest models visit here:

brainly.com/question/29836726

#SPJ4

The number of sweaters in the data is 10 and other statistical measures are computer below

The number of sweaters in the data

This is the total frequency represented in the dot plot

So, we have

Sweaters = 10

The mean, median and mode

The mean is calculated as

Mean = Sum/count

So, we have

Mean = (25 + 25 + 25 + 25 + 30 + 30 + 40 + 40 + 45 + 65)/10

Mean = 35

For the median, we have

Median = (30 + 30)/2

Median = 30

For the mode, we have

Mode = 25

The quartiles

From the dataset, we have

Q1 = (25 + 25)/2

Q1 = 25

Q3 = (40 + 45)/2

Q3 = 42.5

Next, we have

IQR = 42.5 - 25

IQR = 17.5

Are there outliers?

Yes, there are outliers in the plot

And the outlier is 65

This is because 65 is relatively far from other values

Read more about dot plot at

https://brainly.com/question/14438425

#SPJ1

The value of the given integral is 68.

We know that the average value of the function f on the interval [2,6] is 3. Therefore, we can write:

[tex](1/(6-2)) \times \int 2^6 f(x) dx = 3[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex](1/4) \times \int 2^6 f(x) dx = 3[/tex]

Multiplying both sides by 4, we get:

[tex]\int 2^6 f(x) dx = 12[/tex]

Now, we can use this result to evaluate the given integral:

[tex]\int 2^6 (5f(x) + 2) dx\\= 5 \int 2^6 f(x) dx + 2 \int 2^6 dx[/tex]

= 5 × 12 + 2 × (6 - 2)    (using the value of the previous integral)

= 60 + 8

= 68

Therefore, the value of the given integral is 68.

for such more question on integral

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

This is an example of a comparative study that uses random sampling to ensure representation from different socioeconomic groups and educational backgrounds in the samples. The study aims to compare mathematics knowledge among 15-year-olds in the US and Japan by administering a mathematics achievement test to 1000 students from each country.
Hi! I'd be happy to help with your question. You would like to compare mathematics knowledge among 15-year-olds in the US and Japan by giving a mathematics achievement test to samples of 1000 15-year-olds in each of the two countries, with 200 students from low-income families, 400 students from middle-income families, and 400 students from high-income families in each country. This is an example of a stratified random sampling method.

In this case, the population is divided into different strata based on socioeconomic groups (low-income, middle-income, and high-income families), and then random samples are drawn from each stratum. This ensures that the samples include individuals from all different socioeconomic groups and educational backgrounds, which allows for a more accurate comparison between the two countries.

To know more about comparative visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31235299

#SPJ11

The required fourth roots of 2√(3 -2i) are z₁, z₂, z₃, and z₄ which represents in solution part.

To determine the fourth root of a complex number, we can use the formula [tex]z^{(1/4)} = r^{(1/4)} e^{(i \theta/4)}[/tex], where r is the modulus of z and θ is the argument of z.

We can then find the four roots by adding multiples of 2π/4 to the argument.

In this case, the modulus of 2√(3 -2i) is 2√(3 + 2²) = 2√13, and the argument is [tex]tan^{(-1)}(-2/3)[/tex].

Since this argument is in the third quadrant, we need to add π to get the principal argument:

Therefore, the four roots are given by:

[tex]z_1 = 2^{(1/4)} 13^{(1/16)} e^{(-1/8 i tan^{(-1)}{(2/3)})}[/tex]

[tex]z_2 = 2^{(1/4)} 13^{(1/16)} e^{(1/4 i (2 \pi - 1/2 tan^{(-1)}(2/3)))}[/tex]

[tex]z_3 = 2^{(1/4)} 13^{(1/16)} e^{(1/4 i (4 \pi - 1/2 tan^{(-1)}(2/3)))}[/tex]

[tex]z_4 = 2^{(1/4)} 13^{(1/16)} exp(i (-2\pi + 1/4 (6 \pi - 1/2 tan^{(-1)}(2/3))))[/tex]

Therefore, the fourth roots of 2√(3 -2i) are z₁, z₂, z₃, and z₄.

Learn more about the complex numbers here:

brainly.com/question/19007885

#SPJ1