"The Lord is my shepherd" is a statement based upon WHAT

Answer:

Mary Rowlandson's narrative, "A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson," details her experiences during her eleven-week captivity by Native Americans in 1675. In this narrative, Rowlandson provides a vivid account of the events leading up to her capture, the conditions of her captivity, and her eventual release.

Regarding Rowlandson's purpose in writing this narrative, it seems that both personal and didactic elements are mingled here. On one hand, the narrative is a personal account of her traumatic experience and the hardships she faced during her captivity. On the other hand, Rowlandson also uses her narrative to offer religious and moral lessons to her readers, emphasizing the importance of faith in God and highlighting the dangers of straying from the Puritan faith.

In comparison to other Puritan works that show triumph or redemption after suffering, Rowlandson's narrative is unique in its focus on the suffering itself. While other Puritan works may emphasize the triumph of faith over adversity, Rowlandson's narrative instead dwells on the physical and emotional hardships she endured. However, like other Puritan works, Rowlandson's narrative ultimately does offer a message of hope and redemption through faith in God.

When looked at together, the poems of Bradstreet and the Narrative of Rowlandson suggest a shared set of fears and anxieties experienced by women in Puritan society. Both works highlight the precarious position of women in a patriarchal society, where they are subject to the whims of men and must navigate a narrow path of acceptable behavior. The fear of violence and captivity, as experienced by Rowlandson, is also a prominent theme in Bradstreet's poetry. Overall, these works suggest that women in Puritan society faced unique challenges and anxieties, which were shaped by both their gender and their religious beliefs.

The most famous naval battle of the war occurred when the Union’s Monitor and the Confederacy’s Merrimack fought to a draw in March 1862. The Option B is correct.

The battle of the Monitor and Merrimack (March 9, 1862), naval engagement in the American Civil War at Hampton Roads, Virginia, a harbour at the mouth of the James River, notable as history's first duel between ironclad warships and the beginning of a new era of naval warfare.

The Confederates salvaged the Northern-built Merrimack, a conventional steam frigate, from the Norfolk navy yard and rechristened it the Virginia. This 263-foot (80.2-metre) improvisational masterpiece resembled, according to one contemporary source, "a floating barn roof" with her upper hull cut away and armoured with iron.

Read more about Civil war

brainly.com/question/24992590

#SPJ1

Answer:

How does the congress create laws

Explanation:

The process by which Congress creates laws in the United States is known as the legislative process. It begins with an idea for a law, which can come from anyone, including individual citizens, interest groups, or the President. Members of Congress, either in the House of Representatives or the Senate, can then introduce a bill, which is a proposed law.

Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee for review and discussion. The committee may hold hearings to gather information and testimony from experts and interested parties. The committee can make changes to the bill, or recommend that it be rejected.

If a committee approves a bill, it is sent to the full House or Senate for debate and a vote. If the bill passes in one chamber, it is sent to the other chamber for consideration. If both the House and Senate pass the same version of a bill, it is sent to the President for approval or veto.

If the President approves the bill, it becomes law. If the President vetoes the bill, it can still become law if two-thirds of the House and Senate vote to override the veto. If the bill is not passed by both the House and Senate before the end of the legislative session, it dies and must be reintroduced in the next session.

As students, the Generation Z cohort has been advocating for curriculum reforms, greater opportunities for free speech, and more relaxed college rules.

Curriculum reforms are seen as necessary to provide students with a more well-rounded and relevant education. This includes more emphasis on practical skills, such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication, as well as more exposure to diverse perspectives and cultures.

Greater opportunities for free speech are also important for Generation Z students, who grew up with social media and a more interconnected world. They want to be able to express themselves and engage in meaningful discussions without fear of censorship or retribution.

Finally, more relaxed college rules are seen as a way to reduce stress and anxiety among students. This includes reducing the workload, providing more flexible deadlines, and allowing for more personal expression through dress and appearance.

Overall, the demands of Generation Z students reflect a desire for greater freedom, inclusivity, and relevance in education. By addressing these demands, colleges and universities can better prepare students for the challenges of the modern world and create a more just and equitable society.

Read more about Generation Z

brainly.com/question/31022427

#SPJ1

Answer: baby boomers

Explanation:

Answer:

One of the most important natural resources that India supplied to Britain in the 19th century was cotton. India was a major producer of cotton, which was in high demand in Britain's rapidly expanding textile industry. The British East India Company began exporting Indian cotton to Britain in large quantities in the late 18th century, and by the mid-19th century, India had become Britain's largest supplier of cotton. However, the trade was heavily controlled by the British, and Indian cotton producers received very low prices for their crops, which contributed to widespread poverty and suffering in India.

Answer:

Explanation:

The Nazis took over the civil service in order to control the government for several reasons. Firstly, the civil service played a crucial role in the day-to-day operations of the government, including the administration of laws, the collection of taxes, and the management of public services. By controlling the civil service, the Nazis were able to exert influence over the workings of government and ensure that their policies and agenda were implemented.

Secondly, the civil service was a symbol of stability and continuity in German society, and its members were seen as being non-partisan and committed to serving the state. By taking over the civil service, the Nazis were able to project an image of legitimacy and stability, which helped to reinforce their power and influence.

Thirdly, the civil service was an important source of information and intelligence, and its members had access to sensitive and confidential information about the government and society. By controlling the civil service, the Nazis were able to gather intelligence and monitor potential threats to their power and influence.

Finally, by taking over the civil service, the Nazis were able to remove potential opponents and critics from positions of power and replace them with loyal supporters. This allowed the Nazis to consolidate their control over the government and suppress dissenting voices.

Overall, the takeover of the civil service was a key step in the Nazi's efforts to control the German government and society, and it helped to pave the way for the establishment of their totalitarian regime.

Its that dude called Joseph Fourier

Answer:

B

Explanation:

He wanted people to fear the Jews because sometimes fear is the best motivator.

Answer:

I'm just going to say good luck.

But B or D

Blackwater's actions would likely be justified as long as they serve their self-interest, which may or may not align with the common good

A company like Blackwater, a private military contractor, could potentially contribute to the common good by providing security services in areas where the state's capacity to provide such services is limited.

The company's involvement in controversial activities such as the Iraq War and accusations of human rights abuses raise ethical concerns.

From a Hobbesian realist perspective, the pursuit of self-interest is the primary motivating factor for individuals and organizations, including corporations.

Therefore, Blackwater's actions would likely be justified as long as they serve their self-interest, which may or may not align with the common good.

Ultimately, the answer to whether Blackwater could contribute to the common good depends on one's values and priorities.

Read more about Hobbesian realist here:

https://brainly.com/question/24122554

#SPJ1

Answer:The major political questions and conflicts during the 1790s concerned foreign policy, economic policy, and the balance of power between states and the federal government.

Answer:

Explanation:

In order to choose the best SACCO chapter for the maize growing project, there are several factors that should be considered. First, it is important to consider the financial stability of the SACCO chapter. This can be done by researching the financial statements of the SACCO chapter and looking for any red flags that may indicate financial instability. It is also important to consider the interest rates offered by the SACCO chapter, as this can make a big difference in the overall cost of the loan. Additionally, it is important to consider the terms and conditions of the loan offered by the SACCO chapter, as this can also have an impact on the cost and overall success of the project.

Once the SACCO chapter has been identified, it is important to ensure that a thorough business plan is developed. This plan should include an analysis of the costs and benefits associated with the project, as well as a risk assessment and a strategy for managing any potential risks. Additionally, it is important to consider the impact of interest rates, loan terms, and other factors on the profitability of the project. In terms of financing, it is important to ensure that the loan amount is sufficient to cover the expected costs of the project. Additionally, the SACCO chapter should be willing to provide guidance on how to best apply business mathematics by calculating profit and loss, commissions, and other expenses associated with the loan. Finally, it is important to ensure that adequate insurance is in place to protect the project from any unexpected losses.

Answer:

Question: Orissa Tenancy Act was passed in?

Explanation:

The Orissa Tenancy Act was passed in 1913. It is a law that governs the relationship between landlords and tenants in the state of Odisha (formerly known as Orissa) in India. The act was passed during British rule in India and aimed to protect the rights of tenant farmers who worked on land owned by landlords. The act has undergone several amendments over the years to address changing social and economic conditions in the state.

Dr. Bennett supported his assertion that religious liberty is often referred to as the "first freedom" by emphasizing its historical and legal importance in the United States.

In his book, "The American Patriot's Bible," Bennett argues that religious liberty was one of the primary motivations for the founding of the United States and that it is enshrined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. He also notes that religious freedom was central to many of the early colonial settlements in America, as people sought to practice their faith without interference or persecution.

Moreover, Bennett cites numerous historical documents and speeches that affirm the importance of religious liberty as a fundamental human right, including Thomas Jefferson's Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom and George Washington's letter to the Hebrew Congregation of Newport. By highlighting these sources, Bennett demonstrates the enduring legacy and significance of religious liberty in American society and culture.

Read more about religious liberty

brainly.com/question/21653703

#SPJ1

All true statements about the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States. The attacks involved hijacking of four planes, and killed over 3,000 people. The attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists and were the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history.

Hijacking is a criminal act in which a person or group unlawfully and forcefully takes control of a vehicle, aircraft, or other mode of transportation. It is typically done with the intention of stealing the vehicle or using it to commit other crimes. Hijacking is a serious crime that can lead to physical and psychological harm, as well as the loss of property. In some cases, hijacking can even lead to death. Hijacking is a form of terrorism and is illegal in most countries. To prevent hijacking, many countries have implemented strict security measures for air, road, and sea travel. These measures can include increased security checks, armed guards, and the installation of metal detectors.

To learn more about hijacking
https://brainly.com/question/3523284
#SPJ1

Complete Question:
Which statements are true of the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States? Check all that apply.

A. It was the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history

B. The attacks involved hijacking of four planes

C. The attacks killed over 3,000 people

D. The attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists

Answer:

The extent to which communism was an actual threat to American citizens during the 1950s is up for debate. On one hand, the Soviet Union had become a nuclear superpower and had the potential to cause significant harm to the United States. On the other hand, the Cold War was largely a propaganda war, and the actual threat of a Soviet invasion of the United States was minimal. It is also important to note that the fear of communism was largely driven by the politics of the era, and the Red Scare was used as a tool to discredit political opponents. Ultimately, the extent to which communism posed an actual threat to American citizens during the 1950s is difficult to assess.

Explanation:

please mark me brainliest

Governments governed by socialism acknowledged that funding scientific research fell under their purview.

The impact of science in European society in the immediate years after World War II was significant. The war had accelerated technological advancements, particularly in the areas of aviation, electronics, and nuclear energy. The development of radar, for example, played a crucial role in the war effort, and the research that went into developing it led to many other technological breakthroughs.

After the war, there was a widespread belief that science could be used to improve people's lives and create a better future. Governments invested heavily in scientific research and development, particularly in the areas of health, agriculture, and transportation. This led to the creation of many new technologies and products, such as antibiotics, synthetic fertilizers, and automobiles, that changed the way people lived and worked.

To know more about World War II

brainly.com/question/10211667

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Operation Torch was a military campaign during World War II in which Allied forces landed in North Africa to fight against Axis powers. Here are some potential SPICE outcomes at the end of Operation Torch:

Social outcomes: The end of Operation Torch may have had social implications for North Africans, who experienced the war as a result of the military campaign. The fighting likely disrupted daily life, and civilians may have faced displacement, injury, or death. The campaign may have also had social implications for the Allies, as they adjusted to the realities of fighting a global war.

Political outcomes: The end of Operation Torch may have had political implications for North Africa, as the region became a site of conflict between the Allies and Axis powers. The campaign may have also had political implications for the Allies, as they worked to coordinate military operations and navigate diplomatic relations with other countries.

Intellectual outcomes: The end of Operation Torch may have had intellectual implications for the Allies, as they reflected on the campaign and its outcomes. Military leaders may have evaluated their strategies and tactics, and scholars may have analyzed the impact of the campaign on the war as a whole.

Cultural outcomes: The end of Operation Torch may have had cultural implications for North Africans, who experienced the war as a result of the military campaign. The fighting likely disrupted cultural practices, and civilians may have faced destruction of cultural sites or artifacts. The campaign may have also had cultural implications for the Allies, as they encountered new cultures and environments during the fighting.

Economic outcomes: The end of Operation Torch may have had economic implications for North Africa, as the fighting likely disrupted trade and commerce in the region. The campaign may have also had economic implications for the Allies, as they sought to secure access to natural resources and other economic benefits from the region.

Answer:

Justification: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki The use of atomic bombs by America to attach Hiroshima and Nagasaki cities which are in Japan has been a controversial debate over time. The debate has for decades raged on whether the United States was justified to use atomic bombs during the final phases of the World War 2.

Explanation:

When Napoleon tried to close the European continent to British Trade, the British responded with an attack on the European coast.

Napoleon's Continental System was an economic blockade that aimed to cut off Britain's trade with the rest of Europe. Napoleon aimed to make Europe self-sufficient by promoting internal commerce while limiting British imports and exports. The Continental System faced many challenges and was never fully implemented. The British responded by blockading the continent, causing the Continental System to collapse. Napoleon's invasion of Russia was a disastrous attempt to enforce the Continental System.

The British response to the Continental System included the establishment of a naval blockade and a focus on trade with the Americas and the East. The British Navy patrolled the coasts of Europe, intercepting and seizing any ships suspected of trading with France. The British also established a network of spies and smugglers to help them break the blockade. As a result of this blockade, the French economy suffered greatly, and Napoleon's empire began to crumble.

For more questions on Napoleon

https://brainly.com/question/361806

#SPJ11

The Information, Real Estate and Rental and Leasing and Retail Trade sectors contributed the most to Washington's GDP in 2022, representing a combined 48.3% of nation GDP.

Washington relies upon greater closely on excise taxes, along with the customary sales & use tax, selective sales taxes, and the gross receipts tax (business & occupation tax) than most any different state

Washington's farms power a numerous agricultural economy, led through the state's apple enterprise with 70 percentage of U.S. production.

Some of the elements that make Washington's economic system the quality performing encompass the fact that it has the most fast-growing companies and the best possible exports cost per capita, over $7,000,” she instructed The Center Square in an email.

Learn more about Washington's economy here:

The author's main argument is that Congress has been unwilling to tackle politically contentious issues, such as immigration, and has instead allowed the executive branch to encroach upon its authority.

Immigration is the process of people moving from one country to another for the purpose of settling there. It can be voluntary or involuntary, and it can be for a variety of reasons, such as economic, political, social, or cultural. Immigration has been an important factor in the growth and development of countries around the world. It can bring new skills and diversity to a nation, while at the same time often creating tension and controversy.

The author's main argument is that Congress has been unwilling to tackle politically contentious issues, such as immigration, and has instead allowed the executive branch to encroach upon its authority. The result of this is that Congress has failed to address the issue, leading to the creation of executive branch initiatives such as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA). However, these initiatives have been struck down by the federal courts, and Congress still has not taken any action. The author suggests that a constitutional amendment is needed to ensure that Congress is given the authority to make decisions and tackle politically contentious issues.

To learn more about immigration

https://brainly.com/question/1916562

#SPJ1

Answer: Declaration of Pillnitz, joint declaration issued on August 27, 1791, by Holy Roman Emperor Leopold II and King Frederick William II of Prussia, urging European powers to unite to restore the monarchy in France; French King Louis XVI had been reduced to a constitutional monarch during the French Revolution. The French government largely interpreted it as a threat to its sovereignty, and a series of provocations ensued, culminating in France declaring war on Austria (over which Leopold ruled) in April 1792.

The French Revolution was greeted with apprehension by many European leaders, who feared unrest in their own countries. Monarchs grew particularly worried as Louis XVI was forced to accept the authority of the newly proclaimed National Assembly in 1789. Unhappy as a constitutional monarch, he engaged in various duplicities, and in June 1791 he attempted to escape to Varennes but was subsequently captured. Two months later Leopold and Frederick William met in Pillnitz, Saxony (now in Dresden, Germany). Both were concerned about the possible spread of revolution, and they also faced strong pressure from French émigrés to intervene. Furthermore, Leopold was the brother of Louis’s wife, Marie Antoinette, whose safety was in doubt. These concerns led the two men to issue a five-sentence declaration that stated “that they view the situation in which the King of France currently finds himself as a subject of common interest for all of Europe’s sovereigns.” They continued by calling on these powers to “use the most efficient means…to place the King of France in a position to be totally free to consolidate the bases of a monarchical government.”

Answer:

One negative result of American Imperialism is the exploitation and oppression of colonized peoples and their resources. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the United States pursued an imperialistic foreign policy that involved expanding its political and economic influence beyond its borders. This led to the colonization of various territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines.

In these territories, the United States implemented policies that were meant to benefit American interests, but often had negative consequences for the local populations. For example, the U.S. government imposed taxes on Puerto Rican sugar exports, which hurt the island's economy and led to widespread poverty. In the Philippines, the U.S. military engaged in brutal suppression of Filipino independence movements, resulting in the deaths of thousands of civilians.

Moreover, American Imperialism had long-term effects on the colonized nations, including the erosion of traditional cultural practices and the suppression of local languages. The imposition of American values and systems also disrupted local economies, creating a reliance on foreign imports and leading to a loss of indigenous knowledge and skills.

Overall, American Imperialism had negative consequences for the people and lands that were colonized, and its legacy continues to shape global power dynamics and social issues today.

The event that occurred in the weeks following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand is Germany declared war on both Russia and France.

Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a prince of Austria-Este and was assassinated in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina, on June 28, 1914. This incident is the immediate cause of World War I. The following events occurred in the weeks following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand: On July 5, the Kaiser met with his leading advisers and set Germany on a course that led to war with Russia and France. The Kaiser's army leaders demanded war to suppress the Russian threat before it was too late.

Germany declared war on Russia on August 1 and France on August 3. The Schlieffen Plan was launched by Germany on August 4, which was an attack on France via Belgium. This act of aggression sparked the First World War.

For more such questions on assassination

https://brainly.com/question/30191539

#SPJ11

Russia, a vital partner, shared borders with Bosnia & Herzegovina. (Option C)

The dissolution of the Yugoslavian Socialist Federal Republic led to the war in the region of Bosnia and Herzegovina. As a consequence of the demise of the confederational structure after the Cold War, a crisis developed in Yugoslavia.

Serbia was at war with Austria-Hungary as of July 28. As of this point, it was aware that taking significant action against Serbia would put it at risk of going to war with Russia, which was Serbia's ally. Austria-Hungary knew it could count on German support, so it was willing to take a chance in a conflict. A conflict in all of Europe was now in danger due to the Balkan problem.

To know more about Bosnia visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24213561

#SPJ1

Answer:

William the Conqueror was a significant figure in English history, known for his successful conquest of England in 1066. He was a skilled leader, warrior, and statesman who changed the course of English history. This essay will explore the life, achievements, and legacy of William the Conqueror.

William the Conqueror was born in Normandy, France, in 1028. He was the son of Robert I, Duke of Normandy, and his mistress Herleva. As a young boy, William was sent to be educated in the court of his uncle, the Duke of Brittany. He was trained in the arts of war and diplomacy, which would serve him well in his future conquests.

In 1066, William invaded England with a force of Normans, defeating King Harold II at the Battle of Hastings. He was crowned King of England on Christmas Day, 1066. William consolidated his power by establishing a feudal system and constructing castles throughout England. He also commissioned the Domesday Book, a survey of land and property in England that provided valuable information about the country's resources and wealth.

William's legacy extends beyond his military conquests and political achievements. He was a patron of the arts and culture, sponsoring the construction of many churches and cathedrals, including the famous Bayeux Tapestry. He also encouraged the growth of the English language and literature, commissioning the first Norman French version of the English law code.

In conclusion, William the Conqueror was a significant figure in English history, whose achievements had a lasting impact on the country. He was a skilled leader, warrior, and statesman who changed the course of English history. His military conquests, political achievements, and cultural contributions continue to be studied and celebrated today. William's legacy serves as a reminder of the importance of leadership, diplomacy, and cultural patronage in shaping the course of history.

A way in which the passage reflects a differences between the political or economic policies of Egypt and China in the period 1750-1900 is that Egypt was largely under the control of foreign powers such as the Ottoman Empire, while China remained largely independent.

Egypt was also a more centralized state, with power concentrated in the hands of a small ruling elite, whereas China had a complex bureaucracy and a system of imperial dynasties that maintained stability and continuity.

Economically, Egypt was largely agricultural and relied heavily on the export of cash crops such as cotton and sugar. However, it was also heavily in debt to European powers and was forced to cede control of its finances and economy through a series of treaties known as the Capitulations.

In contrast, China had a more diversified economy, with a strong emphasis on manufacturing and trade, particularly in luxury goods such as silk and porcelain. China also had a closed-door policy towards foreign trade, which meant that it was not as heavily influenced by foreign economic powers as Egypt was.

Read more about Egypt policies

brainly.com/question/11615302

#SPJ1

The correct answers to the given question related to a girl scout school encampment are below:

From my knowledge of such events, participants often learn valuable skills such as teamwork, leadership, and survival skills in the outdoors. They may also learn about environmental stewardship, community service, and cultural diversity.

Participating in the Girl Scout School Encampment can be a fun and exciting way to develop new skills and become more aware of global issues. By engaging in outdoor activities and learning about environmental issues, participants may become more conscious of their impact on the environment and learn to take actions to reduce their carbon footprint.

B. World Thinking Day:

World Thinking Day is a day of celebration and learning for Girl Scouts and Girl Guides around the world. Participants learn about different cultures, traditions, and global issues. They may engage in activities that help them understand and appreciate the diversity of people and cultures around the world.

Participating in World Thinking Day can help participants become more aware of global issues and develop a sense of empathy for people from different backgrounds. By learning about different cultures and traditions, they may become more tolerant and understanding of others. They may also be inspired to take action to address global issues such as poverty, inequality, and environmental degradation.

Read more about girls scout here:

https://brainly.com/question/30667300

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

There were several reasons that Japanese traditionalists had for disliking Western culture, particularly during the Meiji Restoration period (1868-1912), when Japan began to modernize and adopt Western-style institutions and practices. Some of these reasons include:

Cultural and Religious Differences: Many Japanese traditionalists saw Western culture as being fundamentally different from their own culture, with different values and beliefs. This included religious differences, as many Japanese were followers of Shintoism and Buddhism, while Western culture was predominantly Christian.

Fear of Losing Traditional Japanese Culture: Some traditionalists feared that the adoption of Western culture and values would lead to the erosion of traditional Japanese culture and identity. They saw Westernization as a threat to their way of life, and believed that it would lead to a loss of national pride and identity.

Political Concerns: Some traditionalists believed that the adoption of Western-style institutions, such as democracy and constitutional government, would undermine the power of the emperor and the traditional ruling class. They saw Westernization as a threat to the established social order and the traditional power structures of Japanese society.

Economic Concerns: Some traditionalists were concerned that the adoption of Western-style capitalism would lead to the exploitation of the poor and working classes, and that it would create a society that was focused solely on material wealth and profit, rather than on traditional values and virtues.

Overall, Japanese traditionalists saw Western culture as a threat to their traditional way of life, identity, and values, and were often resistant to the changes that came with modernization and Westernization.