The adequacy of a premise is usually a matter of

several developments, including the rise of conservative politics, the civil rights movement, the Vietnam War, and the economic changes of the 1970s triggered a transitional era that followed the New Deal coalition.

The civil rights movement was a social and political movement in the United States that aimed to end racial discrimination and segregation against African Americans and other minority groups. The movement began in the mid-1950s and continued through the 1960s, marked by protests, marches, and acts of civil disobedience. Key leaders of the training included Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and John Lewis, among many others. The campaign achieved significant gains with landmark legislation such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. These laws ended segregation in public places and guaranteed the right to vote for all citizens. The civil rights movement sparked a broader movement for social justice, inspiring activism in areas such as women's rights, LGBTQ rights, and disability rights, among others.

Learn more about civil rights movement here:

https://brainly.com/question/8980965

#SPJ1

True as The Landrum-Griffin Act, also known as the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, was passed in 1959.

It was designed to regulate the internal affairs of labor organizations and protect union members' rights by setting standards for union elections, financial disclosures, and restrictions on union officials' financial interests.

The Act also appointed the U.S. Secretary of Labor to act as a watchdog of union conduct, ensuring that the law is upheld and that union members' rights are being protected.

It also prohibits officers of labor unions from receiving financial benefits from employers, in order to reduce potential conflicts of interest.

To know more about Landrum-Griffin Act click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28962841#

#SPJ11

However, based on a general understanding of the history of female prison reform in the 19th century, option d. "Making female prisons decidedly 'female institutions'" is unlikely to be a principle that guided reformers.

As different reformers and reform movements may have emphasized different principles at different times.  Instead, many reformers sought to make prisons more humane, with an emphasis on rehabilitation and education rather than punishment. They also recognized the particular needs and vulnerabilities of women prisoners, such as the need for medical care, protection from abuse by male guards, and opportunities for child care and family visitation. Separating women prisoners from men and employing female staff were also important goals for many reformers.

To learn more about reform movements visit;

https://brainly.com/question/18299282

#SPJ4

Correct question:

During the 19th century, which of the following was not a principle that guided female prison reform?

a. The separation of women prisoners from men

b. The provision of care in keeping with the needs of women

c. The management of women's prisons by female staff

d. Making female prisons decidedly "female institutions"

Answer:

True, testosterone administration induces a red shift in democrats

The contract types that are beyond the scope of application of the statute of frauds are oral contracts for services that last more than 20 months. (C)

The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be legally enforceable. The Statute of Frauds specifies six types of contracts that must be in writing, or they will be unenforceable under the law, except in cases where an exception applies.(C)

Contracts that fall outside the Statute of Frauds are known as non-fraudulent contracts.

This means that these contracts can be enforced without a written contract, and they do not require a written agreement to be legally enforceable.In conclusion, oral contracts for services that last more than 20 months are beyond the scope of application of the statute of frauds.

To know more about Statute of Frauds  click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/6806950#

#SPJ11

The given statement " police are allowed to move belongings around under the plain view doctrine if they think that there may be illegal contraband hidden in the house." is false as the police may not move objects to get a better view, and they may not be in a location unlawfully.

The officer must have reasonable grounds to believe the object is either contraband or evidence of a crime in order to legally seize it. The police may not enter a space illegally or move objects to improve their view.

An officer may seize evidence of a crime that is plainly visible without a warrant under the plain view doctrine, a rule of criminal procedure. This doctrine serves as an exception to the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unwarranted searches and seizures.

The probable cause requirement, however, places restrictions on the plain view doctrine because it allows officers to search or seize items only after they have reasonable grounds to believe they are contraband.

Learn more about plain view doctrine at:

brainly.com/question/28332116

#SPJ4

Studies similar to riis' were most effective in prompting action by the federal government during the 1960.

In the United States, Riis was one of the first to think of photographs as tools for social change. He was also one of the first to use flash powder to take pictures of interiors, and his book How the Other Half Lives was one of the first to successfully use halftone reproduction. Riis supported the idea of taking city children on outings to farms and meadows in the countryside because she believed in the advantages of being in touch with nature.

Riis demanded that the city's less affluent housing have adequate lighting and sanitation. He requested that wealthy and middle-class citizens assist the less fortunate. These ideas motivated Roosevelt, the police commissioner. The riskier tenements were shut down by him.

Learn more about federal government at:

brainly.com/question/371257

#SPJ4

The federal government provides grants-in-aid to state and local governments as a means of supporting initiatives that are deemed important to the nation's economic growth, development, and welfare.

According to the following option, the federal government's chief reason for providing grants-in-aid is to give money to state and local governments for specific purposes. Grants-in-aid are monies given to a government or other organization for a particular purpose or project. Grants-in-aid are often given by a higher-level government to a lower-level government to support a public program.

Some examples of grants-in-aid are: formula grants that are awarded for a particular purpose with particular rules specified in advance; Project grants that are awarded to support specific projects, generally following a competitive selection process; Block grants that are given to states or communities for a variety of purposes without many constraints; categorical grants, which are provided for a specific function or to a specific group of people.

These grants frequently come with conditions and demands, which can include reporting obligations, maintenance of a specific program or policy, or matching funds from the grant recipient. The federal government provides grants-in-aid to the state and local governments in order to make it possible for the states to carry out the policies and programs that are of federal concern.

These policies and programs are intended to address issues that transcend state boundaries. They are intended to be able to provide the funding that is necessary to implement programs that are beyond the states' budgets.

For more questions on federal government

https://brainly.com/question/31134219

#SPJ11

The bystander effect is John's response to the car accident. (D)

He did not feel compelled to dial 911 because he assumed someone else had already done so.

The bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon in which individuals are less inclined to offer assistance in an emergency situation when others are present. The assumption is that someone else would intervene or assume responsibility for the situation.

The effect has been proven in several studies, and it is thought to occur due to the following reasons: diffusion of responsibility, social influence, and evaluation apprehension.Social norms refer to the unwritten rules that govern the behavior of a group of people. (D)

Conformity to social norms is when an individual adjusts their behavior, attitudes, or beliefs to align with those of a group. People frequently conform to social norms to be accepted, to feel good about themselves, or to avoid conflict.

However, if a person's opinions or values differ significantly from those of the group, conformity to social norms may be challenging, and individuals may opt for individualism instead.

To know more about bystander effect click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29775854#

#SPJ11

The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution states that all powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states and the people. This means that educational policy is mainly a state and local matter rather than something controlled by the federal government.

The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution grants the state governments the power to regulate education. The best option that describes the significance of the tenth amendment to the Constitution with respect to education is that it grants the state governments the power to regulate education. The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights.

It is a brief text, yet it is significant for the reason that it codifies the idea of federalism into the Constitution. According to the Tenth Amendment, any powers not granted to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved for the states or the people. Tenth Amendment and Education According to the Tenth Amendment, the states hold authority over all matters that the Constitution does not assign to the federal government, including education.

Therefore, states have the power to establish education policies, and they have the responsibility of ensuring that their citizens receive an education. The Tenth Amendment allows state governments to regulate education as they see fit, rather than allowing the federal government to make decisions for them. It also protects citizens' rights to choose their children's education, which varies depending on where they reside.

The significance of the tenth amendment to the constitution with respect to education is that it grants the state governments the power to regulate education. It is therefore the best option.

For more such questions on Tenth Amendment

https://brainly.com/question/17631263

#SPJ11

The northeastern region of the U.S. has more lobbyists per capita than Texas and Texas has fewer registered lobbyists per capita than just about any other state is accurate after analyzing the infographic details.

Both Texas and California have 9 lobbyists per 100,000 residents per capita, the same number as California. The number of lobbyists active at the state level is about the same as the number of lobbyists to the federal government in Washington, D.C.  It has shorter legislative sessions. With more than $3 million in expenditures from 2015 to 2021, Texas also ranks second among the 19 states monitored by Open Secrets for state-level lobbying by pro-gun organizations.

Many lobbyists have experience in government and are knowledgeable about the policies they advocate for. Opponents of the pluralist perspective argue that organized interests are too broadly construed and don't speak to the needs of specific populations or issues.

Learn more about per capita at:

brainly.com/question/13601488

#SPJ4

Option A, that is affirmative action (de jure), and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (de facto).

Affirmative action is a public policy that was put in place to correct de jure discrimination that African Americans faced.

This policy was designed to increase the representation of historically marginalized groups in education, employment, and other sectors where they had been previously excluded. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a law that was put in place to address de facto discrimination in the form of voter suppression.

The act was passed to ensure that every citizen of the United States could vote without facing any discrimination. Together, affirmative action and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 are important policies designed to address both de jure and de facto discrimination.

Learn more about affirmative action at

https://brainly.com/question/13609219

#SPJ11

Prison guards use their authority and force to make prisoners comply. Prison guards use their authority and force to make prisoners comply is an example of the exercise of legitimate power.

Legitimate power is a type of authority that originates from an individual's legitimate right to influence or command others through a formal position.

The individuals who hold positions of authority have legitimate power over the individuals who do not. Prison guards are an example of people in positions of power, which gives them the legitimate power to exert their authority over the prisoners. Prison guards' exercise of power is possible because they are legally authorized to enforce prison laws and regulations, and they have the right to use force when necessary to ensure prisoner compliance with these laws and regulations.

As a result, they can exercise legitimate power over the prisoners, and this power is legitimate because it is derived from their legal position as prison guards. Moreover, the prison guards use their power to maintain discipline and order within the prison system, which is essential for the safe and efficient running of the prison. Without the authority and power of the prison guards, the prison would not be able to function effectively. Therefore, the exercise of legitimate power by prison guards is an essential element in the functioning of the prison system.

To know more about Prison guards refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/25588046#

#SPJ11

True. The Assistant District Attorneys (ADAs) are the lawyers who handle the prosecution of criminal cases in the United States.

They work closely with victims of crime, as well as with law enforcement officials, in order to build a case against the accused. ADAs are typically employed by the district attorney's office, which is responsible for prosecuting criminal cases in a particular jurisdiction. They are responsible for conducting legal research, gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, negotiating plea bargains, and presenting cases in court. In some cases, ADAs may also be responsible for providing legal counsel to victims of crime and their families, or for working with community organizations to address issues related to crime and public safety.

To learn more about Assistant District Attorneys visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30619492

#SPJ4

The Supreme Court determined that the right of the press to print classified material is protected under the First Amendment's freedom of the press clause.

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, with the power to review and interpret the Constitution. The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

The Supreme Court has the authority to determine whether laws passed by Congress are constitutional or not. It also has the power to interpret the Constitution and decide how it applies to specific cases.

The Supreme Court plays a vital role in protecting the rights of citizens and ensuring that the government follows the Constitution.

For such more question on Supreme Court:

https://brainly.com/question/30707746

#SPJ11

The term "logrolling" refers to a process in which congressional committees, often referred to as "standing committees", remain in existence from one congressional session to the next.

These committees have the power to propose and write legislation, and are considered the most important committees in Congress.

Logrolling is the practice of gaining support for one's own legislative proposals in exchange for supporting the proposals of another member.

This process of bargaining and negotiation is essential in passing legislation in Congress.

To know more about logrolling click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/1420557#

#SPJ11

Option (d) all of these is the correct answer for the question "In classifying offenders, correctional administrators put them into groups based on".

Correctional administrators classify offenders into groups based on their needs for treatment, risk, and security issues they pose to the prison. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer. Offenders with similar characteristics are grouped together so that they can be managed effectively, and resources can be allocated appropriately. The needs of each offender are identified and addressed through various programs such as education, substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment, and vocational training. The level of risk posed by each offender is evaluated so that security measures can be adjusted accordingly. This helps to ensure the safety of both the offender and the correctional officers.

Learn more about correctional officers:

https://brainly.com/question/3394858

#SPJ1

Diminishing marginal returns can occur to a single factor of production while constant returns to scale are present. Option A is correct. The statement is true. As long as only one input has diminishing marginal returns, it is possible to have constant returns to scale. Here's a detailed explanation: Diminishing marginal returns are present when an additional unit of an input results in a decrease in the production of output.

This applies only to short-run production, as some inputs are kept constant, and the productivity of each unit of input is different in the short and long term. In the long run, all inputs can be increased, and therefore the productivity of each unit of input is the same. Returns to scale relate to long-run production, which involves increasing all inputs simultaneously.

It can be classified into three categories: constant, increasing, and decreasing returns to scale. Constant returns to scale occur when all inputs are increased, and the output increases in the same proportion; doubling the inputs, for example, would result in doubling the output. Diminishing marginal returns relate to the productivity of a single input, whereas returns to scale relate to the productivity of all inputs.

A single factor of production can exhibit diminishing marginal returns while maintaining constant returns to scale. Therefore, option A is correct.

To know more about Diminishing marginal returns refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/15120714#

#SPJ11

Every vehicle operated on state roadways must be covered by insurance through a company that is authorized to do business in the state.

This insurance coverage is mandated to ensure that drivers are financially responsible in case of accidents or damage caused to others. The minimum insurance coverage required varies by state, but typically includes liability coverage, which covers the cost of damages or injuries caused by the insured driver to others. Some states may also require additional coverage such as personal injury protection or uninsured motorist coverage. It is important for drivers to obtain the required insurance coverage to avoid legal and financial consequences, such as fines, license suspension, or even lawsuits.

To learn more about insurance visit;

https://brainly.com/question/27822778

#SPJ4

In the Whitey Bulger case, all of the above principles about restitution were illustrated.

It was difficult for victims or families of victims to calculate their total loss, and the offender was in prison, making it difficult to collect and distribute restitution to the victims.

Additionally, the offender was not identified, making it even more difficult to collect restitution.

To ensure that restitution is paid to victims, offenders must be identified, the total losses of victims must be calculated, and an appropriate restitution plan must be developed and enforced.

To know more about restitution click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30761914#

#SPJ11

The following are the penalties on the tax return preparers that the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations do not impose:

An honest mistake or inadvertent error made by a tax return preparer will not result in a penalty. In this case, a tax return preparer may rectify the mistake and file the correct return or refund within a specified time period.

Tax return preparers are not penalized for failing to file an amended return or refund claim after rectifying an error or mistake made in a prior return or refund claim. However, if a tax return preparer is paid for the preparation of an amended return or refund claim, the preparer may be subject to a penalty if the claim or return is incorrect.

The Internal Revenue Code and regulations do not require tax return preparers to register or obtain a preparer tax identification number (PTIN) if they do not file tax returns or make refund claims for compensation. The penalty for non-compliance with this requirement will not be imposed on tax return preparers who do not file tax returns or make refund claims for compensation.

The penalties on the tax return preparers that the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations impose are as follows: Failure to comply with the due diligence requirements, which include checking the validity of Social Security numbers, can result in a penalty of up to $100 per failure. The penalty for failing to sign a tax return or refund claim is $50 per failure.

The penalty for understating the tax liability on a tax return or refund claim is the greater of $1,000 or 50% of the income from the preparation of the return or refund claim. The penalty for the use of abusive tax shelters or any other illegal tax avoidance schemes is $1,000 per taxpayer per year. A taxpayer may also sue a tax return preparer for damages if the preparer engages in fraudulent or deceptive conduct in the preparation of the return or refund claim.

the internal revenue code and the regulations do not impose penalties on tax return preparers for which of the following?

To know more about The Internal Revenue Code refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31050378#

#SPJ11

U.S. presidents once grew to have so much authority that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. foresaw an imperial administration.

Imperial administration refers to a type of government that exercises authority over a vast and diverse territory or empire, often involving the rule of one individual or a small group of individuals. In this type of administration, there is a central government that exercises control over various regions, territories, and subject peoples.

The concept of imperial administration has been present throughout history, from ancient empires such as the Roman Empire to modern empires like the British Empire. Imperial administration often involves a hierarchical system of government, with the central government delegating authority to local officials and administrators.

Imperial administration can be both efficient and effective, as it allows for centralized decision-making and coordination of resources. However, it can also be criticized for being overly bureaucratic, oppressive, and authoritarian, as it often relies on force and coercion to maintain control over subject populations.

Overall, imperial administration remains a topic of study and debate, with scholars and policymakers grappling with the advantages and disadvantages of this type of government.

Learn more about Imperial administration here:

https://brainly.com/question/28021557

#SPJ1

This quotation is about how Congress has a dual role as both a lawmaking institution and as a representative of the people. Members of Congress are expected to prioritize the nation's interests over their own ambitions and must find a balance between addressing national concerns and the specific needs of their states or districts.

Congress refers to the national legislative body of the United States that makes laws, and its members are elected officials representing their districts or states. The two houses that makeup Congress are the Senate and the House of Representatives. Together, they work towards creating a fair and just society.

Learn more about Congress at https://brainly.com/question/25117359

#SPJ11

The legal system which is based on a detailed set of written rules and statutes that constitute a legal code is known as a codified legal system.

Learn more about legal system: https://brainly.com/question/10456202

#SPJ11

Option B. The sentence that  reveals the central idea that the antislavery movement laid the foundation for the women's suffrage movement is Anthony compared the situation of enslaved African Americans to that of women.

This sentence highlights the connection between the struggles of African Americans and women during the 19th century. It implies that the injustices faced by enslaved African Americans provided a basis for the arguments made by women's rights activists like Anthony, who drew parallels between the oppression of enslaved African Americans and the lack of rights for women.

By comparing the situations, Anthony sought to make the case that both groups were entitled to equal rights and protections under the law. This argument laid the foundation for the broader social justice movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, including the women's suffrage movement, which ultimately led to the passage of the 19th Amendment to the US Constitution granting women the right to vote.

Read more on  women's suffrage movement here:https://brainly.com/question/8862360

#SPJ1

There were several technology-related warrants that were still being debated in the Supreme Court. These included:

Cell Phone Location Data: The Supreme Court had not yet decided on whether law enforcement agencies need a warrant to access historical cell phone location data.

Vehicle GPS Tracking: The Supreme Court had not yet decided on whether law enforcement agencies need a warrant to install a GPS tracking device on a suspect's vehicle.

Email Privacy: The Supreme Court had not yet decided on whether the government needs a warrant to access a person's email stored on a third-party server.

It is possible that since my knowledge cut-off in 2021, the Supreme Court has made decisions on these cases or new cases have arisen.

To know more about the supreme court here

https://brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ4

The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Dunn in 1987 further defined the curtilage question.

The case established a four-factor test to determine whether an area is within the curtilage of a home, which includes the proximity of the area to the home, whether the area is enclosed by a physical barrier or not, the nature of the uses to which the area is put, and the steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by people passing by. The physical location of retrieved trash is a critical factor in determining the legality of a warrantless trash inspection. Additionally, police cannot trespass to gain access to the trash location, and the trash must not be located within the curtilage.

Learn more about Supreme Court's,

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ4

Full Question ;

The most important factor in determining the legality of a warrantless trash inspection is the physical location of the retrieved trash. Police cannot trespass to gain access to the trash location, and, generally, the trash must not be located within the curtilage, which the Supreme Court has described as "the area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life." In other words, curtilage is that portion of a residence that is not open to the public. Which court case further defined the curtilage question?

"Paul buys a bottle of Great Wine. He drinks it and becomes very ill. Doctors find the wine contained anti-freeze. Paul may not sue Great Wine because he assumed the risk of drinking alcohol, an inherently dangerous product" the statement is true.

Learn more about anti-freeze: https://brainly.com/question/1382943

#SPJ11

The Federal Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 mandated that the same 10-year penalty be imposed for the possession of 50 grams of crack cocaine as for the possession of 5,000 grams of powder cocaine.

This Act was passed with the intention of targeting the sale and possession of crack cocaine, which was more accessible and affordable in inner-city communities.

The Act failed to consider the racial implications of the disparity between the sentences, as the African-American population was disproportionately impacted by the harsh penalties.

This discrepancy was addressed in the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which reduced the disparity in sentencing.

To know more about racial implications click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30942487#

#SPJ11

The decision in Miranda v. Arizona required the police to read suspects their Miranda warnings when a suspect is in custody and prior to questioning.

The Miranda warnings are a set of statements that inform a suspect of their constitutional rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

The purpose of these warnings is to ensure that suspects understand their rights and to protect them from self-incrimination during custodial interrogations.

Failure to read Miranda warnings to a suspect prior to questioning can result in the suppression of any statements or confessions made during the interrogation in court.

Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona at:

https://brainly.com/question/4429252

#SPJ1

The Lisbon Treaty amendments state that the respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, and respect for human rights are some of the shared values upon which the European Union is founded.

which items farther to the right being the least powerful, more truly depicts the legal force behind?

The EU can take action against a state if it violates or threatens to violate these standards. Due to its legal identity, the European Union has its own legal system that is distinct from international law. Moreover, EU legislation affects its Member States laws directly or indirectly and is incorporated into each State's legal framework.

The European Union is a source of law in and of itself. Respect for human dignity, equality, freedom, and solidarity are some of these core principles. The stated objectives of the EU are to uphold the universally held values of liberty, democracy, and the rule of law as well as to defend human rights. Accountability, transparent governance, just laws, and readily available, impartial justice are the four guiding ideas that assist to further define the rule of law.

Learn more about Constitutional Law:

https://brainly.com/question/14398727

#SPJ1