Men ruled Aryan culture, and women were submissive. Caste endogamy—marrying within one's caste—was another feature of Aryan civilisation.
A rigorous caste system, patriarchal culture, and complicated judicial system defined the Aryan civilisation.
What is Aryan civilization?Generally, The Aryan civilization, which existed in ancient India, had a complex social structure that was divided into four main classes, or varnas: Brahmins (priests and scholars), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (traders and farmers), and Shudras (servants and laborers). Within each varna, there were sub-divisions known as jatis. The caste system, which determined a person's occupation and social status, was an integral part of Aryan society.
Politically, the Aryan civilization was made up of small kingdoms and chiefdoms, each with its own ruler. Over time, larger kingdoms and empires emerged, with a central ruler who held power over a number of smaller kingdoms. The Aryan civilization was also characterized by a complex system of laws and regulations, which were codified in texts such as the Manusmriti and the Dharmashastra.
Read more about Aryan civilization
https://brainly.com/question/1088042
#SPJ1
If someone opposed the ratification of the constitution because it gave to much power to the national government what could they best be described as
If someone opposed the ratification of the constitution because it gave too much power to the national government what could they best be described as Antifederalists.
The establishment of a more strong federal government in the United States and the eventual ratification of the U.S. Constitution as it was adopted by the Constitutional Convention in 1787 were both opposed by a group of Americans known as the Anti-Federalists.
Since they associated British oppression with strong governments, many Anti-Federalists favored a limited central government. Others wished to promote democracy and feared that the wealthy would control a powerful government. They believed that the new federal government was receiving an excessive amount of power from the states.
The key anti-federalist leaders were George Mason, Melancton Smith, Patrick Henry, and James Winthrop.
The supporters of the Constitution and a stronger national republic were known as federalists. Anti-Federalists favored a small, localized government and opposed the ratification of the Constitution.
To know more about Anti-Federalists refer to: https://brainly.com/question/1939977
#SPJ1
Careers in which area are most likely to pay the highest salaries?
OA. Human services
OB. STEM
OC. Humanities
OD. Trades
Answer:
STEM b.
Explanation:
https://trustmebro.square.site/
Though Japan's imperial system is thousands of years old,
Japanese emperors had very little power during the 17th,
18th, and 19th centuries. In 1867, a series of events known
as the Meiji restoration returned control of Japan to its
emperor. Powerful Japanese emperors led a
modernization program in Japan that allowed it to become
wealthy and powerful during the 20th century. The
Japanese Empire used its military power to conquer Korea,
Vietnam, parts of China, and other territories in Southeast
Asia during this period. During World War II, Japan fought
as one of the Axis powers but was forced to surrender.
after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on
Japanese cities. Though the United States considered
ending the imperial system entirely, it eventually allowed
the emperor to remain in place. However, his power was
R
greatly reduced, and present-day Japanese emperors serve
ceremonial roles instead of being political leaders.
What is one
example of change described in the passage?
The best change described in the passage is -
Japan’s emperor was with wielded only ceremonial power from the end of World War II until today.
constitutional monarchy- A constitutional monarchy is a type of government in which the real power is vested in the executive selected by the people while the monarch is the only titular head of the government. All the functions of the government are done in the name of the monarchy, but the power to make decisions is in the hand of the legislature which is chosen by the people.
After world war two defeat, the monarchy of japan was disempowered and installed as a ceremonial head.
The other famous example of a constitutional monarchy is the Kingdom of Great Britain.
To learn more about the types of government please click on the link https://brainly.com/question/18464634
#SPJ1
One effect of the Watergate scandal was that:
how were people who lived far away from the big cities able to stay up with current fasion trends?
What was the size of a No man’s Land?
Answer:
No Man's Land is the term used by soldiers to describe the ground between the two opposing trenches. Its width along the Western Front could vary a great deal. The average distance in most sectors was about 250 yards (230 metres).
Explanation:
i looked it up
1What is Earth's intergalactic movement?
he Local Group moving towards an enormous collection of galaxies 45 million light-years away
our sun and its family of planets, moons, asteroids and comets orbiting the center of the Milky Way Galaxy
ur sun and solar system moving at about 500,000 mph in this huge orbit
arth's rotation on its axis and revolution around the Sun
The planet Earth never rests, but it constantly moves through the universe. The earth rotates around its own axis and rotates completely 360 ° every day. This corresponds to an equatorial velocity of approximately 1700 km / h, which decreases at higher latitudes.
As you know, there are two types of movements on the earth: rotation and rotation. Rotation is the movement of the earth around its axis. The movement of the earth around the sun in a constant orbit is called a revolution. The axis of the earth, which is a fictitious line, forms an angle of 66½ ° with its orbital plane.
In a new report published in the Royal Astronomical Society's monthly report, researchers at Durham University theorize that our galaxy and its closest neighbors will clash in 1 to 4 billion years.
Learn more about Earth's movement here: https://brainly.com/question/15819603
#SPJ1
Whom did Julius Caesar defeat to become the ruler of Rome?
Answer:
Pompey
Explanation:
Julius Caesar crafted an alliance with Marcus Licinius Crassus and Pompey to form the First Triumvirate and challenge the power of the Roman Senate. After Crassus's death, Caesar led his army into Italy, defeated Pompey, and claimed the title of dictator.
Answer:
Caesar led the Roman armies in the Gallic Wars before defeating his political rival Pompey in a civil war.
But Alfonso knew Raul, a paperboy with dollar signs in his eyes, would charge him, and he had less than sixty cents, counting the soda bottles he could cash.
What is the connotation of the underlined description, and what does it say about Raul?
The description is negative. It means that Raul cares too much about money.
The words underlined here are "with dollar signs in his eyes", implying that Raul cares too much about money. I knew that worrying too much about money would be a burden.
Alfonso's was not a positive review by Raul. If someone is portrayed as having dollars in their eyes, it means that person's thinking or vision is clouded or money-driven, and they put some effort into getting money, regardless of the outcome.
Money is an object or verifiable record that is commonly used in a particular country or socio-economic situation as payment for goods and services and to repay debts such as debts. B. Taxes are accepted.
Learn more about money here:https://brainly.com/question/24373500
#SPJ1
Suppose that you were an advisor to Moctezuma II. What might you have told him about Cortés? Should he have allowed Cortés to enter Tenochtitlan? Why or why not?
If i am advisor to Moctezuma II, What I might have told him about Cortés is that he should not have invited him, he should not have allowed Cortés to enter Tenochtitlan since he does not know much about Cortés.
Why did Moctezuma II invited Cortés?The invitation by Moctezuma II was a result of the curiosity by him and because he didn't see them as a threat.
However, he think he can buy Cortés off but unfortunately for him he could not.
Learn more about the Moctezuma II at https://brainly.com/question/235055
#SPJ1
What is likely to happen if a nondemocratic government responds to internal unrest with the use of force by the military or by police?
A. Democratization
B.immediate intervention by neighbouring countries
C.Increase discontent and anger towards the government
D.quilling of initial dissatisfaction that led to internal unrest
Answer:C
Explanation: Because if a nondemocratic gets hold of the government and there is unrest people protesting they will must likely respond with force. Then that will make the people madder at the government they were already mad and instead of the government to talk it out and try to fix the problem they will attack that will only make the people madder. They will feel as if they cant trust the government and if there is no trust that is really bad there becomes even more chaos.
Read the excerpt from the Publius.
In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.
—Publius
How would Federalists most likely respond to this?
They would agree but doubt the Constitution could make that happen.
They would doubt that any central government could meet these goals.
They would argue that the government does not need to control itself.
They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Last option. The way that the federalist would react to this would be They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Who are the federalists?These are the people that believe so much in the power of the federal government.
They are of the opinion that the democracy needs a central power that has to take care of the affairs of the states of the nation.
Read more on federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/412270
#SPJ1
The Federalists most likely D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Who were the Federalists?The Federalists were among the American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.
The Federalists were opposed to the views of the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.
The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution to check the excesses of government.
Thus, the Federalists, D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ1
The term "domestication" describes the taming of animals for usage with humans, such as in herds or as farm animals.
What theme of history does the word domestication fall best under?
Geography
Economics
Religion/ethical systems
Culture
Power/authority
Science/technology
The theme of history that the word domestication is going to fall under would be culture.
What is domestication?This is the term that is used to refer to the system of raising animals such as goats, sheep dogs etc.
These are the animals that are not considered to be dangerous. Certain cultures had specific animals.
Read more on domestication here:
https://brainly.com/question/4914896
#SPJ1
What two questions were at the heart of McCulloch v. Maryland?
A. Does the national bank fit into the Full Faith and Credit Clause? How do states regulate bank transfers between states?
B. Was the national bank constitutional? Can states tax it?
C. Can a national bank exist within a Federal System? Can states have checks on a national bank?
D. Which brank of government controls the national bank? Which branch of government regulates taxes on the national bank?
Answer: the correct answer is B
Explanation: congress having the power to create a national bank was not in any part of the constitution therefore the most important question for the supreme court was whether they have the power or not. In the end, the supreme court stated that yes they do have the power although the power to create a national bank is not in the constitution congress does have the power of necessary and proper clause. the 2n question was whether the state can tax the federal government. and in the end, it was concluded that no state cannot tax a federal government this extends the power of the national government.
What is the Purpose of Jackie Robinson letter?
The Purpose of Jackie Robinson letter is to demonstrates Jackie Robinson's activism on behalf of the civil rights movement.
Why did Jackie Robinson write the letter?Jackie Robinson who was most famous Negro League wrote this letter so as to pass a message on behalf of the civil rights movement so as to portray freedom and claim citizenship rights of African Americans.
In this case, The Purpose of Jackie Robinson letter is to demonstrates Jackie Robinson's activism on behalf of the civil rights movement.
Learn more about Jackie Robinson letter on:
https://brainly.com/question/1150336
#SPJ1
2. Which of these is the best definition for glasnost?
an attempt to introduce free elections in the Soviet Union
allowing western nations to invest in Soviet businesses
allowing other, non-communist parties to run in Soviet elections
© a push for more openness in the Soviet government
Answer:
Glasnost can be best defined as a push for more openness in the Soviet government.
Which of the following movements argues that people sometimes fail because of circumstances that are out of their control?
Socialism
the Social Gospel
Naturalism
Social Darwinism
Read the Background Information to answer the following question. Which of the following best defines the word tyranny as it is used in this passage?
*"[America] had to be strong enough to maintain national unity over a large geographic area, but not so strong as to become a *TYRANNY*".
A.)careful management of the wealth and resources of a country or region
B.)cruel and oppressive government or rule
C.)government in which citizens freely participate in elections
D.)rule by a single leader who inherits their position
The best definition of tyranny from the passage on the need for the U.S. government to be strong is B.)cruel and oppressive government or rule.
Why was there a need for a strong central government?A strong central government would allow for the United States to be more united and to maintain national unity despite the fact that the nation is so large.
However, there is a need for the central government not to be so powerful that it becomes tyrannical and forms a cruel government where the people are oppressed.
To to this, the CONSTITUTION included a separation of powers principle both between the branches of the federal government, but also between the state and federal governments.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on the strong national government at https://brainly.com/question/26649788.
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements best explains why the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a significant political event?
Choose 1 answer:
Choose 1 answer:
(Choice A)
A
It prohibited discrimination in public places, employment, and voting
(Choice B)
B
It extended suffrage to African American men and women
(Choice C)
C
It removed structural barriers to minority voting
(Choice D)
D
It prevented schools and universities from discriminating against female students
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a significant political event because it prohibited discrimination in public places, employment, and voting.
What was Civil Rights Act of 1964?It was a legislation that prohibited any form of discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in U.S.
Hence, it a significant political event because it prohibited discrimination in public places, employment, and voting.
Therefore, A is correct.
Read more about Civil Rights Act
brainly.com/question/1094200
#SPJ1
4. Why was the INF Treaty an important change in the Cold War arms race?
O it pledged both the U.S. and the Soviet Union to getting rid of all nuclear weapons by 1990.
O The Soviet Union removed its INFs from eastern Europe and the U.S. got rid of the Strategic Defense Initiative.
The U.S. removed its INFs from western Europe and the Soviet Union accepted the Strategic Defense Initiative.
• It cut the number of INFs almost to zero, and allowed the U.S. and Soviet Union to inspect each other's military bases.
The reason why the INF treaty was an important change in the Cold War arms race was that It cut the number of INFs almost to zero, and allowed the U.S. and Soviet Union to inspect each other's military bases.
What did the INF treaty do?
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was a treaty that was signed in 1887 between Ronald Reagan and the Mikhail Gorbechev of the Soviet Union that saw both nations agreeing to reduce their nuclear stockpiles.
This deal led to both the United States and the Soviet Union dismantling thousands of Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces missiles which would have decimated Europe had both nations gone to war.
The treaty also allowed for American and Soviet officials to go to both nations and inspect their military bases for compliance in what was a historic agreement.
In conclusion, the INF treaty cut the number of INFs almost to zero, and allowed the U.S. and Soviet Union to inspect each other's military bases.
Find out more on the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty at https://brainly.com/question/11888991
#SPJ1
Which of the following would the government have stepped in to control most quickly during the war time?
A. A labor union strike at a factory
B. A community planting their own food in backyards
C. A company merging with another company
D. Railroads concentrating building in the West
Reset Selection
Answer:
I would say a labor union strike. The government would have factories manufacturing things for them, like bullets for example. If workers go on strike then production would be halted and those needed bullets wouldn't be made.
Explanation:
Answer: A.) A labor union strike at a factory
I got it correct on founders edtell
Which of the following is an example of absolute chronology?
O A. The United States invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003.
OB. The United States responded to the Pearl Harbor attack by
declaring war on Japan.
O C. After OPEC placed an oil embargo on the United States, gas was
in short supply.
OD. The 1950s are remembered by some as a time of peace.
Answer: A
Explanation:absolute chronology means the exact date not after not before so a gives us the exact date they invaded Iraq.
Debs saw a nation out-of-balance, where a small group of business owners and the government had a singular focus on churning an economic machine to the detriment of all else. He saw a democratic government no longer focused on its founding role or ideal to be for and by the people, taken over. He found it morally unacceptable. Can you see his point at the time? Would he be pleased today or more convinced?
The inference based on the information given is that Debs is right.
What is an inference?It should be noted that an inference is the conclusion that is deduced based on the information given.
In this case, the inference based on the information given is that Debs is right. The government is there for the people and they should be focused on representating the people as a whole.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
When did world war 1, please help me ASAP
World War 1 started Jul 28, 1914 and ended Nov 11, 1918.
Does anyone know about the history of The Opium War？
Answer:
The Opium War, usually the Opium War refers to the First Opium War, which the British often refer to as the First Sino-British War or "Trade War", which was an unjust war of aggression launched by Britain against China from 1840 to 1842, and also the beginning of China's modern history of humiliation.
In 1840 (the twentieth year of Daoguang), the British government decided to send an expeditionary force to invade China under the pretext of Lin Zexu's Humen tobacco sales. In June 1840, 47 British ships and 4,000 army personnel, led by Rear Admiral George Yilu and Yi Lu, the commercial supervisor in China, arrived outside the mouth of the Pearl River in Guangdong province, blockaded Haikou, and the Opium War began.
The Opium War ended with China's defeat and the cession of land in reparations. China and Britain signed the Treaty of Nanking, the first unequal treaty in Chinese history. China began to cede land, pay indemnities, and agree on tariffs to foreign countries, which seriously endangered China's sovereignty, began to degenerate into a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, lost its independent and autonomous status, and promoted the disintegration of the small-scale peasant economy. At the same time, the Opium War also opened a new chapter in the history of the resistance of the Chinese people to foreign aggression in modern times.
Explanation:
All of the following countries have three or more political parties that hold some power EXCEPT: A. Germany B. England C. China D. France Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
The nation that does not have multiple political parties holding power is C. China.
Is China a Democracy?China is not a democracy and is instead a one-party state where the only legal political party is the Chinese Communist Party.
The leadership of the nation is chosen from this party which means that the CCP holds absolute political power in China.
Find out more on China's government at https://brainly.com/question/909136
#SPJ1
Answer: B
Explanation:
AN ACT To enforce the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled that this Act shall be known as the "Voting Rights Act of 1965."No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.
The act that illustrates that no voting qualification or prerequisite to voting or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any state is the voting right acts of 1965.
What is the voting rights?It should be noted that the voting rights act was put in pace to ensure that everyone participated in elections.
The act illustrates that no voting qualification or prerequisite to voting or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed.
Learn more about voting rights on:
brainly.com/question/744348
#SPJ1
Each of the 50 states has its own array of
public officials with each of them having which
of the following?
Select one:
O a. Presidents, assemblies, and courts
b.
Governors, legislatures, and courts
O c. Leaders, parliaments, courts
O d. Burgesses, lawyers, and courts
Option B. Each of the 50 states has its own array of public officials with each of them having : Governors, legislatures, and courts
What is the system of government in the states?
The states are known to have the type of government where they have the governor who is the number one person in that particular state. Just as the federal system of government, they have the other arms as the judiciary and the legislative arm.
The judiciary is made up of the state courts. These are the ones that interprets the laws that have being made in the states. After which there is the legislative arm that has to do with the law makers.
Read more on state laws here: https://brainly.com/question/946945
#SPJ1
Russia was originally formed by a mixture of which two cultures?
Answer:
All i know is
1) Salvs
2)Vikings
Shay’s rebellion started because?
Answer: Because of pay.
Explanation: Many farmers that had fought in the military were given low to almost no compensation. So they began burning down federal buildings. That's why it's named Shay's rebellion, after Daniel Shay, there leader. Daniel Shay was a farmer who severed in the military during the battle of Bunker Hill.
Answer:
The State of Massachusetts were raising taxes on land and providing little compensation to war veterans, farmers owned a lot of land but earned little money so a retired war veteran, Daniel Shay and a few other people started burning down local buildings.