solve each equation.

Answer: 58.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i will take company (a) because they are giving in less rate

Answer:

You would want to go with A

Step-by-step explanation:

If you do plan a it is 180 dollars a year when you spend 15 dollars per GB, B is cheaper on the other hand because it is 75 dollars a month so therefore 900 dollars a year

A is cheaper

Answer: 42

Step-by-step explanation:

Complementary angles are angles in which the sums equal 90.

90 - 48 = 42.

Answer:

4b & 2b are like terms

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I got 5.19.

Step-by-step explanation:

With this number there is no way to get a perfect sqaure. When you square root it, you get a decimal. If there's an option where it says no perfect square I'd suggest putting that

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

15+15+15+15= 60

i hope this helps

Answer:

The answer is 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

1 hour = 60 minutes

Therefore;

Fraction of 15 minutes with respect to 1 hour is;

15 minutes/ 1 hour

=15 minutes/60 minutes

=1/4

Therefore the answer is 1/4

Hope this helps.

Answer:

x = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

The two opposite interior angles that are opposite to the exterior angle are congruent as shown in the diagram.

Therefore, based on the exterior angle theorem of a triangle, we have the following equation:

2(7x + 2)° = (17x - 23)

14x + 4 = 17x - 23

Collect like terms

14x - 17x = -4 - 23

-3x = -27

Divide both sides by -3

-3x/-3 = -27/-3

x = 9

Answer:

72 + a (1 + a)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

im not  smart

Step-by-step explanation:

i need points

Answer:

[(–5) + (–3)] + 6 = –2

[6 + (–5)] + (–3) = –2

Step-by-step explanation:

Look at the image below!

Hoped I helped :3 Sorry if wrong :( Mark brainiest if correct! Your bootiful/handsome! Have a great day luv <3

-Bee~

Answer:

C and E

Step-by-step explanation:

i got it right on edge just now

Answer: no solution

Step-by-step explanation:

They have the same slope which means they are parallel lines that will never cross or intersect. This mean that there is no solution

Answer:3y=−2x+12

y=(−2x+12)/3

y=-2x/3+4

m=-2/3

perpendicular -1/m=3/2

y=mx+c

y=3/2x+12

2y=3x+12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

45°

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

x° = (90-x)° [Alternate exterior angles]

=> 90 - x = x

=> 90 = x + x

=> 90 = 2x

[tex] = > x = \frac{90}{2} [/tex]

=> x = 45°(Ans)

the answer is b.7

Step-by-step explanation:

because you have to plug in the f(4) to the equation like this

f(4)=3(4)-5

and then multiple 3x4 which is 12 then subtract 12 and 5 and you get 7.

Answer:

[tex]y = -x^2+3x+4[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

( -1, 0) , (0, 4) , (4, 0)

y = a(x − b)(x − c)

x-intercept = -1

x = -1

(x + 1) = 0

x-intercept = 4

x = 4

(x - 4) = 0

y = (x + 1)(x - 4)

4 = a(0 + 1)(0 - 4)

4 = a (1)(-4)

4 = -4a

a = -1

y = -1(x + 1)(x - 4)

[tex]y = -x^2+3x+4[/tex]

Answer:

EX: Use three coins to represent the wolf, the goat, and the cabbage. ... The slope from (0, 0) to any point (x, y) on the line will be y_ x . 8b. b 7.5. 9a. ... 11b. x 2. 10x. 25 x. 4 x x2. 4x. 7. 7x. 28. 11c. xy 2y 6x 12 11d. x 2. 2x. 3. 2 x y ... 13c. 4 yr. 13d. 24. ___. 20. 6 __. 5 1.2. 14a. 3 x 2. 16x 5. 1. 3x x 3x2. 15x. 5. 1x.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:  i) Reasonably symmetric

=============================================================

Explanation:

The data set is

35,40,45,49,51,54,57,58,58,64,68,68,75,77

Erase the outer pair of values (35 and 77) to end up with this smaller set

40,45,49,51,54,57,58,58,64,68,68,75

Repeat and erase off the outer values (40 and 75) to end up with

45,49,51,54,57,58,58,64,68,68

Keep going until we have either one or two elements left

At this point, we see that the center is between these two last values. So the median is (57+58)/2 = 57.5

--------------------------------

The center is at 57.5

Let L = {35,40,45,49,51,54,57} consist of the set of numbers lower than the median

Let U = {58,58,64,68,68,75,77} be the upper set of values larger than the median.

The middle of set L is 49 and the middle of set U is 68. So Q1 and Q3 are 49 and 68 respectively.

From that, we see the IQR = Q3 - Q1 = 68-49 = 19

Let A and B be the lower and upper fence

We would then say

A = Q1 - 1.5*IQR = 49-1.5*19 = 20.5

B = Q3 + 1.5*IQR = 68 + 1.5*19 = 96.5

Notice how all of the given data values are between A = 20.5 and B = 96.5, which means we don't have any outliers.

Furthermore, if we plotted a box-and-whisker plot (see below), we can see that the two whiskers are fairly the same length. It's not perfect but they're reasonably symmetric. Similarly, the median is somewhat in the middle of the box itself. So this gives a rough idea that the data set we're dealing with is fairly symmetric.

More confirmation can be in the form of a histogram which is also part of the image below. This histogram is fairly symmetric as the left half is nearly (not perfectly) a mirror image of the right half, and vice versa. No one side pulls too far out to create a highly skewed distribution.

Answer:

[tex]x = 4\\y = 9[/tex] hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Given -

x represents the number of hours lifeguarding and y represents the number of hours landscaping

[tex]x+ y = 13[/tex] -----Eq ( 1 )

and

[tex]20 * x + 10 * y = 170[/tex] -----Eq ( 2 )

Substituting the value of [tex]x = 13-y[/tex] in equation 2, we get -

[tex]20* (13 - y) + 10 y = 170[/tex]

[tex]260 - 20 y + 10 y = 170\\10y = 90\\y = 9[/tex]

[tex]x = 13-9 = 4[/tex]

Answer:

From top to bottom:

[tex]0, 1, 2, -8, -8[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the piecewise function:

[tex]g(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 0.5x+1 & \text{if } x \leq 2 \\ -8 & \text{if } x > 2 \end{array} \right.[/tex]

Row 1:

We want to find g(-2).

Since -2 is less than (or equal to) 2, we will use the first equation. Thus:

[tex]g(-2)=0.5(-2)+1=-1+1=0[/tex]

Row 2:

Likewise, 0 is less than or equal to 2. We will continue to use the first equation:

[tex]g(0)=0.5(0)+1=1[/tex]

Row 3:

2 is not less than 2 but it is equal to 2. So we will continue to use the first equation:

[tex]g(2)=0.5(2)+1=1+1=2[/tex]

Row 4 and 5:

Both 4 and 6 are greater than 2. Thus, we will use the second equation. Therefore:

[tex]g(4)=-8\text{ and } g(6)=-8[/tex]

Answer:

you got this

Step-by-step explanation:

go with your gut and you sure can win

Answer:

I can help.

Step-by-step explanation:

3a is closer to 1, because 12/12 is 1. and 6/12 is 1/2

3b is closer to 0, because 0/6 is o. and 3/6 is 1/2.

3c is 1 and 1 1/12

11/12 + 1/6

find the common denominator. 12. 6×2 and 1×2 then add straight across.

Answer:

(-1,5)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 8×10×10×10×10

Step-by-step explanation: Hope this helps :)

Answer:

8×10×10×10×10

Step-by-step explanation:

this one

Have a nice day and I hope I helped you:)

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C. yes, because both lines have a slope of 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:   M = -20w + 450

Step-by-step explanation:

M = -20w + 450

450 is the amount in his bank account; because he is spending $20 per weeks, so it's -20w.

Answer:

1 is the answer 1/1 because it goes one up and one right

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

First choose any 2 points in the line for example ( 2,3 ) ( 3,4 )

[tex]\frac{3-4}{2-3}[/tex]  = 1

Answer:

$2244

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\text{The data given for the quality measurement and other criteria can be seen below:}[/tex]

Quality management      Excellent      Good      Fair      Total

Excellent                             40                   25         5             70

Good                                   35                    35        10            80

Fair                                       25                   10         15             50

Total                                    100                   70        30           200

The null and alternative hypothesis:

[tex]\mathbf{H_o: \text{the quality management and reputation are independent} }[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{H_a: \text{the quality management and reputation are not independent} }[/tex]

The expected value is calculated by using the formula:

[tex]E=\dfrac{row \ total \times column \ total }{table \ total}[/tex]

After using the formula to calculate the table above; we have:

The expected values of the data to be:

Quality management     Excellent         Good      Fair      Total

Excellent                            35                  24.5       10.5      70

Good                                  40                   28         1.2         80

Fair                                     25                  17.5        7.5         50

Total                                   100                  70        30           200

Degree of freedom = ( row - 1 ) × ( column -1 )

[tex]= (3 - 1 ) \times (3 -1)[/tex]

[tex]= 2\times 2[/tex]

[tex]=4[/tex]

[tex]\text{The p-value at level of significance of 0.05 and degree of freedom of 4 = }\mathbf{0.0019}[/tex]

Decision rule: To reject the [tex]\mathbf{H_o}[/tex] if the p-value is less than the ∝

Conclusion: We reject the [tex]\mathbf{H_o}[/tex] and conclude that quality management and reputation are not independent.

(B)[tex]\text{The P-value here implies that in case that there is no dependence between the two ratings, }[/tex][tex]\text{the probability that they will seem to show at least this kind of strong dependence is 0.0019.}[/tex]

[tex]\text{Thus, the probability that they will seem to show at least this kind of strong independence is =}[/tex][tex]\mathbf{0.0019}[/tex]

Answer:4-k÷6

Step-by-step explanation: