Please I need help it’s an emergency

Answer:

8cm

Step-by-step explanation:

8×8×8

[tex] {8}^{3} {cm}^{3} [/tex]

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

simple logic

Answer:shift two units to the right

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

if the function is x the answer is 1 hope it helps

Answer:

39.4

Step-by-step explanation:

9.85 * (4) = 39.4

Answer:

8

888888888888888888888888888

Answer:

1) 25°

2) 155°

3) 25°

4) 25°

5) 110°

6) 30.5°

7) 41°

Step-by-step explanation:

5) 5x + 15 = 8x - 42,  3x = 57,   x= 19, ∠CDE = 5(19) + 15 = 110°

6) 3x + x + 4 + 70° = 180°,  4x = 106°, x = 26.5°, ∠ABC = 26.5° + 4° = 30.5°

7) 2x + x + 4 + 65° = 180°, 3x = 111°, x = 37°, ∠MNO = 37° + 4° = 41°

Answer:

the answer is 38.25

Step-by-step explanation:

45-15%

=38.35

Answer:

$6.75

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve any percent problem, u can use the equation part         %

                                                                                           -------   =   ---

                                                                                         whole       100

(the lines are fraction bars btw, when u right out the problem, write it as fractions)

In this problem, the whole is 45, because that is the original, or whole price. The % is 15, because u want to find 15%. The part would be x, because that's what u want to find. Cross multiply, so ur problem should look like this:

100x = 675.

Then, divide 675 by 100 to get x = 6.75.

So Natalie saves $6.75.

hope this helps!

Answer:

amoug us

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Answer:

a) 3

b) 725

c) 12100

d)3900

The Amount of property taxes you would have to pay per year if the rate was 0.79% is $3,436.50.

If you owned a house and the assessed value was $435,000.00, the amount of property taxes you would have to pay per year

if the rate was 0.79% can be calculated as follows:SolutionTo calculate the amount of property taxes, multiply the assessed value by the tax rate.

We can represent this mathematically as:P = R × Vwhere:P = Property taxesR = Tax rateV = Assessed Value

We are given that:R = 0.79%V = $435,000.00

We need to convert the tax rate to a decimal value before we can use it in our calculation. This can be done by dividing the percentage value by 100. Therefore:R = 0.79 ÷ 100= 0.0079

Using the formula above, we can now calculate the property taxes as:P = R × V= 0.0079 × $435,000.00= $3,436.50

Therefore, the amount of property taxes you would have to pay per year if the rate was 0.79% is $3,436.50.

For more questions on Amount.

https://brainly.com/question/29252044

#SPJ8

Answer:

82.89

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

It actually trying to trick you with a double negative

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Squares do have right angles, if they did not have to then all other ssquares with no right angles would be considered rhombuses.

The question is sking which does not apply, a does not apply but thats what theyre asking so its a

Answer:

lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

math kinda sucks. :) Brainliest pls???

Step-by-step explanation:

x

4

+

50

x

2

+

625Rewrite  

625

as  

25

2

.

u

2

+

50

u

+

25

2

Check the middle term by multiplying  

2

a

b

and compare this result with the middle term in the original expression.

2

a

b

=

2

⋅

u

⋅

25

Simplify.

2

a

b

=

50

u

Factor using the perfect square trinomial rule  

a

2

+

2

a

b

+

b

2

=

(

a

+

b

)

2

, where  

a

=

u

and  

b

=

25

.

(

u

+

25

)

2

Replace all occurrences of  

u

with  

x

2

.

(

x

2

+

25

)

2

answer:

5 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know how I got my answer but please try

Answer with  explanation:

y+1 = 26     ;      y = 26-1 = 25

x-2 = 19           ;    x = 19+ 2 = 21

I hope im roght!!

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

6=2*y+4

6-4=2*y

2=2*y

y=2/2

y=1

Answer:

29/12

Step-by-step explanation:

5/6+1/3+1/2+3/4

10/12+4/12+6/12+9/12

14/12+6/12+9/12

20/12+9/12

29/12

Answer:

a. ∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a < 0 ∧ b < 0 ⇒ a + b < 0

b. ∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ⇒ a - b < 0 ∨ a - b > 0

c. ∀ a, b ∈ Z, a² + b² ≥ (a + b)

d. ∀ a, b ∈ Z, |ab| = |a||b|

Step-by-step explanation:

a. The sum of two negative integers is negative.

First, we take the quantifier ∀ and write the two integers a and b as a element of the set of integers Z as ∀ a, b ∈ Z. Now, if a and b are negative, we write if a < 0 ∧ b < 0 where the logical operator ∧ represents "and". So, we have the statements ∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a < 0 ∧ b < 0. Then finally, we use the logical operator ⇒ to imply the summation of the two integers as ⇒ a + b. And since we are to show that their sum is less than zero, we write ⇒ a + b < 0.

Combining this statement with the previous expressions, we have

∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a < 0 ∧ b < 0 ⇒ a + b < 0

b. The difference of two positive integers is not necessarily positive.

First, we take the quantifier ∀ and write the two integers a and b as a element of the set of integers Z as ∀ a, b ∈ Z. Now, if there exists a and b that are positive, we write if a > 0 ∧ b > 0 where the logical operator ∧ represents "and". So, we have the statements ∀ a, b ∈ Z, a > 0 ∧ b > 0. Then finally, we use the logical operator ⇒ to imply the difference of the two integers as ⇒ a - b. And since we are to show that their difference is either less than zero or greater than zero, we write ⇒ a - b < 0 ∨ a - b > 0 where ∨ implies the logical operator "or".

Combining this statement with the previous expressions, we have

∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ⇒ a - b < 0 ∨ a - b > 0

c. The sum of the squares of two integers is greater than or equal to the square of their sum.

First, we take the quantifier ∀ and write the two integers a and b as a element of the set of integers Z as ∀ a, b ∈ Z. Now, since we are dealing with the sum of the squares of each integer, we write a² + b². And, we are to show that this sum is greater than the sum of the individual integers, we write their sum as a + b, and we show the previous sum to be greater than or equal to this as a² + b² ≥ (a + b).

Combining this statement with the previous expressions, we have

∀ a, b ∈ Z, a² + b² ≥ (a + b)

d. The absolute value of the product of two integers is the product of their absolute values.

First, we take the quantifier ∀ and write the two integers a and b as a element of the set of integers Z as ∀ a, b ∈ Z. Now, since we are to show that absolute value of the product of the integers equals the product of the absolute value of the individual integers, we write the that absolute value of the product of the integers as |ab| and the product of the absolute value of the individual integers as |a||b|.

Since we are to show that this expression and the previous expression are equal, we write |ab| = |a||b|.

Combining this statement with the previous expressions, we have

∀ a, b ∈ Z, |ab| = |a||b|

Answer: 1/4 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Equation for a circle of radius r, centered at (h,k):

(x-h)² + (y-k)² = r²

The coordinates of the center and the measure of the radius for a circle given are center = (3,7), radius = √2.

A circle is a shape or a curve in a plane that has a fixed distance, called the radius, from a given point, called the center. A circle is also the set of all points that are equidistant from the center.

Given is an equation of a circle, we need to find coordinates of the center and the measure of the radius for a circle,

The equation of the circle =

(x - 3)² + (y - 7)² = 2

The standard equation for a circle of radius r, centered at (h,k):

(x-h)² + (y-k)² = r²

Comparing both we get,

(h, k) = (3, 7)

r² = 2

r = √2

Hence, the coordinates of the center and the measure of the radius for a circle given are center = (3,7), radius = √2.

Learn more about circle, click;

https://brainly.com/question/29142813

#SPJ2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It is an arithmetic sequence. The nth term = 499 + n

Answer:

700,000

Step-by-step explanation:

55,325 is closer to 100,000 than it is to 0, so the hundred-thousands place would round up.

Answer:

655,325

Step-by-step explanation:

Im pretty sure it would just stay the same because 3 is not enough to bring the 5 up to 6.