The reason why the INF treaty was an important change in the Cold War arms race was that It cut the number of INFs almost to zero, and allowed the U.S. and Soviet Union to inspect each other's military bases.
What did the INF treaty do?
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was a treaty that was signed in 1887 between Ronald Reagan and the Mikhail Gorbechev of the Soviet Union that saw both nations agreeing to reduce their nuclear stockpiles.
This deal led to both the United States and the Soviet Union dismantling thousands of Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces missiles which would have decimated Europe had both nations gone to war.
The treaty also allowed for American and Soviet officials to go to both nations and inspect their military bases for compliance in what was a historic agreement.
In conclusion, the INF treaty cut the number of INFs almost to zero, and allowed the U.S. and Soviet Union to inspect each other's military bases.
Find out more on the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty at https://brainly.com/question/11888991
#SPJ1
Why was it important to Spanish colonists that their slaves did not know the
terrain of the land?
A. They would be more willing to grow foreign crops on the land if
they knew little about it.
B. They would be less likely to realize how terrible the working
conditions were if they were in a new land.
C. They would be more likely to convert to Christianity if they were
transported to a new place.
D. They would be less likely to run away from the plantations if they
were unfamiliar with the land.
Answer:
Explanation:
D: Except for the most hardy and most courageous of slaves, the answer is definitely D.
C: I don't think they would be more likely to convert. The Jesuits had a terrible time trying to convince people of the "new world" to convert to Christianity, especially if they already had a religion. New World means newly discovered by the Europeans who were interested in profit and colonization and not necessarily the church. It depends on what era you are asking about.
B: I don't really think so. The lay of the land was not on the mind's of the slaves when considering working conditions. Rebellion and murder might have been more to the point.
A: I don't see how to eliminate this one. It is simply wrong. Agricultural techniques was simply not on their mind.
Answer
D
How has modern technology most affected the environment?
The two primary ways that these technologies have harmed our planet are through pollution and the loss of natural resources. When dangerous or excessive levels of gases like carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitric oxide, and methane are released into the earth's atmosphere, air pollution results.
Part B – Finding Other Forms of Transportation
African Americans in Montgomery needed to find a way to get to work after vowing not to ride the bus. A civil rights activist named Bayard Rustin traveled to Montgomery to advise Martin Luther King Jr. While in Montgomery, he kept a diary of what he observed. He noted how police officers harassed, intimidated, and arrested Black taxi drivers for helping to transport boycotting African Americans.
Search the internet for an excerpt from Rustin's diary to learn more about the transportation challenges of the boycotters. Use the space below to take notes about what you learn about Bayard Rustin and his contributions and experiences.
Rustin fought for many causes, mostly racial equality and later gay right. Rustin actually helped during the African American Civil Rights Movement. He actually planned the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Rustin was sidelined from the movement because he was gay. Since he was a gay man he was largely kept out of the public eye.
5. Why did the Puritans want to establish a "city on a hill"?
O to attract people of all faiths to Massachusetts
Oto make their city into a center of trade
O to show how the Church of England ought to be
Oto protect themselves from the Native Americans
Answer:
C) to show how the Church of England ought to be.
Explanation:
For the rest of the globe, the city on a Hill served as a role model. God would punish them if they didn't do what they were supposed to do. The letter declares, "Eyes of all people are upon us," implying that "City on a Hill" could be considered a utopia.
Learn more about "City on a Hill" at https://brainly.com/question/1766764
#SPJ1
As a result of the "corrupt bargain" of 1824, Andrew Jackson
O became the president.
O became secretary of state.
O formed a new political party.
O formed a new cabinet position.
Answer:
a. became the president
Explanation:
As a result of the corrupt bargain of 1824, Andrew Jackson became the president
Select the correct answer.
What is absolute advantage?
A.
having a lower opportunity cost to produce goods than other firms or nations
B.
having a lower cost of production than other firms or nations
C.
having more available resources for producing a good than other nations
D.
having fewer or no trade barriers for international trade than other nations
Answer:
B. Having a lower cost of production than other firms or nations.
Explanation:
In the seventeenth century, economic inquiry emerged as a separate science. But that didn't just happen overnight. The process of crude conceptualization and creation of political economic concepts had long before started to emerge.
Commodity, exchange, money, pricing, loan interest, commercial profit, and other economic concepts were already familiar to ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Hindus, and other peoples.
Ancient Egyptian papyri, the Hammurabi Code, the Vedas of Ancient India, Homer's Odyssey and other works of the ancient Greek poet, Xenophon, Plato, Aristotle and other philosophers of Greek antiquity, etc., all include a wealth of information and ideas that are quite intriguing.
The ancients had very rudimentary knowledge of economic concepts.
The history of economic thought starts with the writings of Xenophon, Plato, and particularly Aristotle, who made the first theoretical step towards an understanding of the economy of ancient Greek society (which was at the stage of the collapse of the primitive-communal system and the rise of slavery) and articulated some remarkable ideas on value, commodity exchange, and the earliest forms of capital: trading (merchant's) and usury capital.
In the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, commerce and monetary activities rather than manufacturing were where capitalist institutions initially emerged.
Eventually, this development of the future capital became known as Mercantilism, which represented the interests of the capital of the merchants in England, Italy, and France. The main spokespersons for it were Thomas Mun and William Stafford in England, Antonio Serra in Italy, and Antoine de Montchrestien in France.
The French mercantilist Antoine de Montchrestien first used the phrase "political economy" in his Treatise of Political Economy (1615), which offered advice on how to manage the state economy and increase the nation's riches. The phrase, which originally meant "the laws of state administration," was derived from three Greek words: "politikos" (state, social); "ikos" (home or its management); and "nomos" (rule of law).
The Physiocrats—Francois Quesnay, Turgot, and others—developed bourgeois political economics later, in the seventeenth century. French economist François Quesnay belonged to the Physiocratic school. He is renowned for publishing Tableau économique (Economic Table), which laid the groundwork for the Physiocrats' theories, in 1758. French statesman Turgot, Baron de l'Aulne, also known as Turgot, was greatly inspired by Quesnay and was also an economist in his own right.
They changed the focus of economic inquiry away from the domain of circulation and toward the sphere of production, in opposition to the mercantilists.
Karl Marx observed in 1859 in the section 'Historical Notes on the Analysis of Commodities' in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy: 'The decisive outcome of the research carried on for over a century and a half by classical political economy, beginning with William Petty in Britain and Boisguillebert in France, and ending with Ricardo in Britain and Sismondi in France, is an analysis of the aspects of the commodity into two forms of labour – use-value is reduced to concrete labour or purposive productive activity, exchange-value to labour-time or homogeneous social labour.' In Capital (1867) he defined political economy: '… by political economy I understand the economy which since the time of W. Petty has investigated the real relations of production in bourgeois society'.
Marx made a distinction between such men as Petty, Smith and Ricardo and their successors. He wrote of the former that they devoted their efforts 'to the study of the real interrelations of bourgeois production', while the latter were 'content to elucidate the semblance of the interrelations' and to act in effect as apologists for the capitalist class. He called them 'vulgar economists'.
Engels had already warned, and shown great foresight, in 1843 when he wrote in his Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy: 'The nearer to our time the economists whom we have to judge, the more severe must our judgment become. For while Smith and Malthus found only scattered fragments, the modern economists had the whole system complete before them: the consequences had all been drawn; the contradictions came clearly enough to light, yet they did not come to examine the premises and still accepted the responsibility for the whole system. The nearer the economists come to the present time, the further they depart from honesty'.
Answer:
See image
Explanation:
Plato
Humanism was a system of thought that focused on human values, interests, and welfare
Humanism was a system of thought that focused on human values, interests, and welfare. It encouraged intellectuals to focus on human accomplishment and potential.
What is humanism?Humanism is what look at how reasoning affects life and also taking into cognizance moral values which are essence of human nature.
It is to be noted that humanism connotes building a more humane society through an ethics based on human and other natural values in a spirit of reason and free.
Learn more about humanism here: https://brainly.com/question/2156753
#SPJ1
Which three statements describe how Russia influenced the 2016 presidential election in Donald Trump's favor?
Answer: Russian hackers sent phishing emails to a business firm to gain access to voter information.
Russian operatives stole documents from email servers in an effort to discredit their opponent.
Russian agents created social media accounts to spread negative information about their opponent.
What evidence did the commission find that made it change the name of the ""tulsa race riot"" to the ""tulsa race massacre""?.
Evidence of The commission found :
That 300 African-Americans—not 26—had been killed. It also found that city officials had provided firearms and ammunition. This was no uprising or it was a slaughter.Why the Tulsa Race Riot named?In recent years there has been ongoing discussion about what to call the event that happened in 1921. Historically, it has been called the Tulsa Race Riot. Some say it was given that name at the time for insurance purposes. Designating it a riot prevented insurance companies from having to pay benefits to the people of Greenwood whose homes and businesses were destroyed. It also was common at the time for any large-scale clash between different racial or ethnic groups to be categorized a race riot.
What is The RIOT?A tumultuous disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled together and acting with common intent.
What is The MASSACRE?The act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty.
Learn more about Riot Vs Massacre on:
brainly.com/question/23910042
#SPJ4
Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.
In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.
You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?
Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.
In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.
You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?
Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.
In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.
You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?
According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.
Good questions to ask are
How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?What is oral arguments?Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.
In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.
Read more about oral arguments
https://brainly.com/question/15266611
#SPJ1
16. Why does a majority of the population in South America reside on the coastlines of the continent?
The majority of the population in South America resides on the coastlines of the continent because most of the cities are near the coast.
What are the benefits of residing near the coastline?Living near the coastline is very beneficial. It gives you productive fisheries and many opportunities, and it protects you from storms and there are many other benefits of the same.
Most South American cities are located near the coastlines. This is because of the physical geography of the continent. That's why the majority of the population in South America are residing on the coastline of the continent. They also leave near the coastline because of easy availability of transportation.
Thus, this is the reason why a majority of the population in South America is residing on the coastlines of the continent.
To learn more, refer to: https://brainly.com/question/21190856
#SPJ9
To what extent is the United States isolated from the world?
The truth of global financial despair and the need for multiplied attention to domestic issues best served to reinforce the concept that United States ought to isolate themselves from troubling events in Europe.
Isolationism refers to the United States' longstanding reluctance to turn out to be concerned in European alliances and wars.
Isolationists held the view that the US perspective in the arena became different from that of European societies and that the USA must grow the reason of freedom and democracy through methods other than the battle.
Learn more about the United States here https://brainly.com/question/21846520
#SPJ1
I need help with this question
Answer:
the answer to this is an idiom
How did the economic boom of the 1920s affect labor unions?
.
Answer:
Unions in the 1920s were harmed by rising wages which made it harder to attract new members.
Was the Patriot Act Patriotic or Unconstitutional? Why or why not? Give a few examples. Has to be at least a paragraph.
Answer: The patriotic act was not unconstitutional, it only expanded on the rights of law enforcement to combat acts of terrorism and money laundering.
Explanation:
The purpose of the USA Patriot Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world. Section 314 helps law enforcement identify, disrupt, and prevent terrorist acts and money laundering activities by encouraging further cooperation among law enforcement, regulators, and financial institutions to share information.
The purpose of the USA Patriot Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world. Section 314 helps law enforcement identify, disrupt, and prevent terrorist acts and money laundering activities by encouraging further cooperation among law enforcement, regulators, and financial institutions to share information.
Source: Director of National Intelligence
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/who-we-are/organizations/ise/ise-archive/ise-additional-resources/2116-usa-patriot-act
why did general macarthur address congress after he was fired?
Answer:
He wanted to thank Americans for treating him as a hero.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!!
Why was the Neolithic Revolution an important turning point in history
The Neolithic Revolution marked a significant turning point in human history. Food production shifted from hunting and gathering to farming (farming). Communities were established permanently as an alternative to nomadic lifestyles (villages). This is further explained below.
What is Neolithic Revolution?Generally, During the Neolithic era, many human societies underwent a massive transformation known as the Neolithic Revolution or the (First) Agricultural Revolution.
In conclusion, The beginning of human civilization may be traced back to the Neolithic Age.
Read more about Neolithic Revolution
https://brainly.com/question/422601
#SPJ1
50
Most Singaporeans are at least bilingual because:
Othey like to feel superior to Americans
their country has been invaded many many times
they frequently travel to other countries
Othere are 4 official languages in Singapore
Most Singaporeans are at least bilingual because there are 4 official languages in Singapore.
What are the official languages in Singapore?Singapore’s four official languages are Malay, Mandarin, Tamil and English. Because of its bilingual education policy, most citizens speak two or more languages usually English, their ethnic mother tongue, and potentially others. It is reasonable to assume that almost 100% of Singaporeans are at least bilingual. There are significant numbers who speak three or four languages, and it is quite normal for a cosmopolitan global city.
The correct answer is option D.
Learn more about the official languages in Singapore, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/16867800
#SPJ9
Most Singaporeans are at slightly bilingual because: Other 4 official languages in Singapore.
How many languages are spoken in Singapore?
Official Languages Expressed In Singapore
Singapore's four official languages are Malay, Mandarin, Tamil and English. Because of its bilingual education policy, most citizens express two or more languages — usually English, their ethnic mother tongue, and potentially others.
According to the Constitution of Singapore, the nationwide language of Singapore is Malay, which plays a representational role, as Malays are constitutionally recognised as the indigenous peoples of Singapore, and the government must protect their language and heritage.
Which language is widely spoken in Singapore?
The most spoken language of Singapore is Mandarin and further varities of Chinese. According to a people census, Mandarin in spoken by almost 51% of Singapore's population.
To learn more about Singaporeans, refer
https://brainly.com/question/1075558
#SPJ9
Unit Activity: Social Studies Concepts
Consider the growth of the country during the 1800s. Use the map and your knowledge of the time period to answer the
following questions:
Part A
Is there a general trend in the direction of the territories acquired?
Answer:
manifest destiny
Explanation:
Manifest destiny was a widely held cultural belief in the 19th-century United States that American settlers were destined to expand across North America
The United States was bent on reaching the Pacific Coast and so kept expanding westward by acquiring territory until they achieved their goal.
westward expansion
following lewis & clarks expedition
https://brainly.com/question/25100145
wikipedia
Answer:
manifest destiny
I dunno how to explain
What’s the answers for 10
And 11 ?
How was the Declaration of Independence the foundation for American Government?
Answer:
together with the constitution and the bill of right the declaration of independence counted as one of the three institutional founding documents of the United States Government
Political Views of_________
Supported
• A strong military
Opposed
• Labor unions
• The Soviet Union and
Communism
• The Civil Rights Act of 1964
Which name best completes the title of this graphic?
A. Barry Goldwater
B. William McKinley
C. Lyndon Johnson
D. Harry Truman
The name that best completes the title of this graphic is A. Barry Goldwater.
Who was Barry Goldwater?Senator Barry Goldwater was a three-term senator from Arizona who ran for the presidency in 1964 and was known for his strong support for the military.
Barry Goldwater opposed labor unionism, communism, and the Soviet Union. He did not actually vote for or against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 but was absent from Congress.
Thus, we can conclude that the political views of A. Barry Goldwater best completes the title of this graphic.
Learn more about Senator Barry Goldwater at https://brainly.com/question/3586664
#SPJ1
PLEASE HURRY
Read this excerpt from the Preamble to the United States Constitution:
United States. Preamble and First Amendment to the United States Constitution. (1787, 1791) Preamble
We, the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the
general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.
How did the 15th, 19th, and 26th Amendments expand the "Blessings of Liberty" to more of the United States population? Write a short essay of 5 to 7 sentences to
explain your answer.
Answer: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Explanation:hope this helps
2. Which of these is true about peasant life of the Middle Ages?
The excitement in their lives depended a lot on where they lived, and what their local noble did.
If they lived in cities, there would be festivals and entertainment on certainly occasions (such as when the noble married or got a son, or religious holidays). Generally, excitement came from things that bring us excitement nowadays (gossip, dancing, getting a crush, marrying etc.) Something as simple as catching a plump rabbit could be a cause for celebration.
They did not have vacations like employees nowadays. Only the nobles could afford to do nothing, or travel to some foreign place or the court. They did not bathe terribly much, but they also weren’t covered in filthy rags.
Which Russian social group became radicalized in the 1860s and 1870s after the failure of educational and agricultural reforms?
A. landless peasants
B. educated liberals
C. Orthodox clergy
D. university students
The educated liberals were the russian social group that became radicalized in the 1860s and 1870s after the failure of educational and agricultural reforms.
What was the main objectives of Liberals?In Russia, the wanted a nation which tolerated all the religions, opposed the uncontrolled powers of dynastic rules and wanted to safeguard the right to individual against government.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about russian social group
brainly.com/question/4515209
#SPJ1
Under communist theory, what determines how much of each good and service is supplied?
Supply
Demand
Community central planning
The invisible hand of the market
Under communist theory, Community central planning determines how much of each good and service is supplied.
Community central planning entails that the government owns and distributes the factors of production and hence they determine how much of each good and service is supplied.
What is Communism?Communism is a system of government where the factors of production such as land, labor etc. are firmly under the control of the government.
This type of economy is also referred to as command economy.
In communism, the government determines how much of a good or service that will be supplied because they control the factors of production that drives commerce.
Learn more about Communism at https://brainly.com/question/12173354
#SPJ1
Which element of the 2011 Arab Spring uprising in Libya best illustrates the
idea of cultural diffusion?
OA. News of rebellions in Tunisia and Egypt helped inspire Libyan
rebels to launch the uprising.
B. The United States played a major role in convincing NATO to help
end the uprising.
OC. Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi attempted to suppress the
uprising with violence.
D. Radical Islamic terrorist organizations from outside Libya
organized and led the uprising.
The idea of cultural diffusion is best illustrated during the Arab Spring uprising because news of rebellions in Tunisia and Egypt helped inspire Libyan rebels to launch the uprising.
It is important to note that the world is intertwined, and hence countries are affected by events which occur in other countries.
Therefore option A is correct
What was the Arab Spring Uprising?The Arab Spring uprising was a series of anti-government protests, events, and armed rebellions that started and spread across much of the Arab world in the early 2010s having its roots in Tunisia.
The events of the Arab spring began as a response to corruption and economic stagnation which was initiated in Tunisia in North Africa and spread through most of the Arab world.
The Arab spring reminds us that nations of the world are bound together and that events which happen in one country may spread to other parts of the globe.
Learn more about Arab Spring at https://brainly.com/question/810543
#SPJ1
The women's suffrage movement organized people to fight for voting rights.
What details should the writer include in the essay to support the thesis?
O opinions about how voting should be carried out by states
arguments about why the voting age should have been lowered in the 1800s
statistics that show the growth and impact of the women's suffrage movement
stories about the families of key figures in the women's suffrage movement
The women's suffrage movement organized people to fight for voting rights was a decades-long fight to win the right to vote for women in the United States.
Women's suffrage movement:
The women's suffrage movement fought for women's voting rights in the United States for many years. It took activists and reformers nearly a century to obtain that right, and the struggle was not without difficulty: disagreements over tactics often put the movement at risk of collapse.
The suffragist movement was divided. The National Woman Suffrage Association is started by Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. The organization's main objective is to grant women the right to vote by a Congressional amendment to the Constitution.
As a result, women gradually began to realize that achieving the change to end women's suffrage can only be successful once they have the ability to vote.
Learn more about the women's suffrage movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/1441724
#SPJ1
Answer:
The women's suffrage movement organized people to fight for voting rights was a decades-long fight to win the right to vote for women in the United States.UnitedUnited
Explanation:
Aside from passing through Muslim empires, what other location did goods need to go through to get to Western Europe?
A. Russia
B. Italy
C. Germany
D. Austria
Aside from passing through Muslim empires, goods also needed to go through Italy to reach Western Europe. Option B is the correct answer.
Italy served as a crucial hub for trade and commerce during the medieval and Renaissance periods. It was strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, and its ports, such as Venice and Genoa, were major centers of trade. Option B is the correct answer.
Italian merchants played a significant role in facilitating the movement of goods between the East and West. They established trade networks and conducted business with merchants from various regions, including the Muslim empires. Italian cities became important marketplaces where goods from the East, such as spices, silk, and precious metals, were exchanged and distributed throughout Western Europe. The Italian city-states, with their wealth and influence, also fostered cultural and intellectual exchanges. They supported the growth of banking and finance, which further facilitated trade and the movement of goods. The Italian Renaissance, with its focus on art, literature, and innovation, also attracted scholars and artists from all over Europe.
Learn more about Muslim Empires here:
https://brainly.com/question/151224
#SPJ2
Which group did the United States eventually side with in World War I?
A. only Britain
B. the triple entente
C. the triple alliance
D. the ottoman empire
Answer:
C. The Triple Entente
Explanation:
(Britain, France, Russia)